0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,347 Given: 369 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,347 Given: 369 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,347 Given: 369 |
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/423079v1
Natufians were 20% CT, I believe pre-E levatine hunter gatherers was CT* before the mashubian intrusion
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
That link doesn’t really say anything about Iberomaurusian genetics. I remember reading somewhere else that Iberomaurusians were mainly ANA and some sub Saharan admixture. Genetically they were different from natufians. Natufians did have a good chunk of admixture from North Africa but either way they were different due to local hunter gatherer admixture and other admixtures. They were also phenotypically different from skeletal comparisons made between them. Iberomaurusians were pure mechtoids and natufians weren’t. And natufians aren’t important in the conversation of where E-V13 comes from because not a single Natufian sample was found to be carrying E-M78.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,689 Given: 23,946 |
It seems that Rocinante was banned for saying the truth after all
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,901 Given: 4,814 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks