0
After all, when in their own countries, Chinese, Koreans and Japanese are at least equally ethnocentric, ethnonationalist, xenophobic etc. as are Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. (Yes, and this includes how they regard Whites, to a certain extent). So how come Northeast Asians living in various countries in Europe, Australasia and the Americas - especially the women - marry out at incredibly high rates? Japanese-American women marry out about 65% of the time, and I believe the figure is similar for Japanese-Brazilians too (and they started doing so even earlier in Brazil than in the US). Chinese women in Britain also marry out around 40% of the time, while the figure is lower but still considerable for Chinese men.
By contrast, in the UK, South Asians marry out barely more than Whites do, despite being a much smaller percentage of the overall population. Indians in the UK marry out around 10% of the time, while the figure is even lower among Pakistanis and Bangladeshis here. (In all three groups, the men marry out marginally more often than the women). One can also observe how endogamous South Asians are in many other countries in the West (plus also parts of Africa and some Pacific Islands). So much for the assumption shared by both intersectionalist leftists and White supremacist rightists that people of other races prefer Whites to their own.
What explains this disparity? Do Northeast Asians tend to be more open-minded, friendly and easy to assimilate? Do Westerners view Northeast Asians as being, overall, higher-status and more attractive than are South Asians? Are religion and tradition big factors? (Since when did Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism have anything to do with the West?)
Bookmarks