0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,362 Given: 5,351 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 389 Given: 148 |
If NA admixture came with the Moors then why is it highest in Galicia, a region which they never controlled?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 198 Given: 13 |
Regardless of what this study says those aren't Berber haplogroups, more like haplogroups with deep origins that Berbers have a lot, the increase presence in Iberia is of obvious origin but but the presence north of the Mediterranean is obviously mediated through other populations.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 198 Given: 13 |
Nobody is saying ALL of the admiture came with the moors, regardless there were internal resettlement of new Christians within late medieval and early modern Spain:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebell...68%E2%80%9371)
And Nassbean can also point out some examples of Roman era and I believe also Islamic era berber communities that remained and were assimilated around Northern Spain.
Let me flip the question, if NA admixture is not of recent(meaning post-Bronze Age) origin, why is there so little evidence for it in Neolithic, Copper age and Bronze age samples outside the south?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,076 Given: 6,670 |
yeah... those charts are off. At least for Portugal.
This is better:
The one with the least samples gives an average of 12%, the median gives an average of 7% and the one with the most samples averages 6%. And in both research, the result is the same: the more trials, the lower the haplogroup's percentage. Portugal's rate is about 5%-6%
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,362 Given: 5,351 |
that's false. Based on more than 1000 samples the average for Portugal is 14% :
https://eupedia.com/genetics/spain_p...html#frequency
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,362 Given: 5,351 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 392 Given: 152 |
No offence, but you're just doing this too often, it's getting boring
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,362 Given: 5,351 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,362 Given: 5,351 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks