Originally Posted by
cmt160
They were an IE-descended and IE-speaking group, but their language (IE-descended) went extinct when the proto-celts expanded and assimilated those bell beakers.
Iirc a bell-beaker language survived up until the roman expansion in Iberia (the lusitanian language) which linguists tried to associate with the italic branch of the italo-celtic languages (Unetice-descended) due to lack of knowledge (thats why they couldn't succesfully associate it with italic languages, and why it officially remains "unclassified") rather than associating it with the bell beakers (which is what it was). Ofc there would be similarities with proto italo-celtic because both Unetice (ancestors of protoitalocelts/protogermanics/protoslavs) and bell beakers were IE descended. But thats the same as pointing out similarities between greek and latin because both are IE so ofc theres resemblance, even if both came from different branches of IE.
Ik this thread is about linguistics, but the "celts" in western europe were genetically/"autosomally" predominately bell beaker, like basically fully/almost fully. They just spoke the language of the elite that conquered them (La Tene/Hallstatt from central europe).
Bookmarks