0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
E is negro.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Where are the younger clades that are found with negroid skulls then lol? Why is the oldest E found with Caucasoid Cro-Magnon like people? Why are there no negroid skulls in North Africa prior to Bantu expansion? Even earlier skeleton found in Egypt 30,000 years ago was cro-mag and Caucasoid. Sub Saharan Africans are a recent addition to north and east Africa. This is all just a fact based on physical evidence no larp like others here.
And you saying E is negroid is giving blacks credibility of Egyptians were black narrative and therefore they can take credit for Egypt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,904 Given: 4,896 |
By the way, before anyone gets triggered again i'm trolling with the Negro E thing, as always. I don't know where E come from, just that M78 is more frequent in Northeast Africa, Southeast Europe and the Levant, and M81 would be the major haplogroup in Northwest Africa
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
The earliest european Cro-Mags are all C. I split from J around Iran/Caucasus and entered Europe later than C.
C comes from CF which comes from CT, you know what else comes from CT? DE. So in a way they are somewhat cousins or at least C carrying Cro-Mags are closer to E carriers than they are to I or R carriers haplos which came later.
Anyways, I’m not talking about specifically european cro-magnon. I’m talking about the common ancestor, basal eurasians. Who where obviously also cro-mag and not black. Proof:
“Nazlet Khater[1] is an archeological site located in Upper Egypt. Excavations at the Nazlet Khater 2 site (Boulder Hill) yielded the remains of two human skeletons. One of the skulls was that of a male subadult. The cranium was generally modern in form, but with very wide face, and evinced some archaic traits in the temple and mandible areas. Below the skull, the skeleton was robust but otherwise anatomically modern. Morphological analysis of the Nazlet Khater mandible indicates that the specimen was distinct from the examined Late Pleistocene and Holocene North African specimens.[2] The Nazlet Khater 2 skeleton possesses two plesiomorphic features in its mandible, which are not found among coeval anatomically modern humans. This suggests that the specimen's ancestors may have interbred with neighboring late archaic humans.[3] At Nazlet Khater 4 to the southeast, Upper Paleolithic axes, blades, burins, end scrapers and denticulates were also excavated. The site has been radiocarbon dated to between 30,360-35,100 years ago.[2] The similarities between NK2 and Upper Paleolithic European samples may indicate a close relationship between this Nile Valley specimen and European Upper Paleolithic modern humans.”
This 30,000 year old Egyptian skeleton resembled UP Europeans, he was not negroid. Negroids as I said are a recent addition to North Africa.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,506 Given: 1,507 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,992 Given: 432 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 206 Given: 174 |
haplogroup E is of African origins thats a fact. I know that some Europeans on this forum are ashamed because they carry haplogroup E(frican). But its stupid and ridiculous to say that haplogroup E is Eurasian. Haplogroup E is ancestors to black-african, and afro-asiatic ( semitic, berber / hamitic, etc).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks