The October Revolution of 2020

[Smaland]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMKxY7JC7tY

If necessary, viewers may wish to set aside the fact that the video host is a Muslim woman in the U.S. Instead, they could focus on the information that she presents.

Her hypothesis: the Communists might attempt to provoke another set of riots, this time among Hispanics and Muslims living in America. They would do so by having hit men attack individual Muslims and Hispanics, who are either women or children. The hit men would be masquerading as white supremacists or Trump supporters.

[The Lawspeaker]

Maybe the only solution would be to respond by attacking Antifa or any other leftists. Don't attack other groups: take on the Left.

[Smaland]

Maybe the only solution would be to respond by attacking Antifa or any other leftists. Don't attack other groups: take on the Left.

Even now, if it would still work, I'd like to follow established legal processes to take care of the Left. That may sound foolish at this point, but the first American Civil War was the most bloody we've ever fought; today, a lot of innocent people could get killed in the crossfire.

However, we simply can't afford to lose.

[The Lawspeaker]

Even now, if it would still work, I'd like to follow established legal processes to take care of the Left. That may sound foolish at this point, but the first American Civil War was the most bloody we've ever fought; today, a lot of innocent people could get killed in the crossfire.

However, we simply can't afford to lose.

Another option would counter-propaganda. The Belgian authorities did just that during the German invasion of 1940 to make sure that the Dutch-speaking Flemish and French-speaking Walloons couldn't be pitted against each other by the invader. They warned the civilian population for German propaganda and against local activists. It was quite successful as local civilians often handed over activists to the Belgian police and army. Those 18 days and some more days in France ended up as the worst days in the lives of those activists - until after the war that is (as the Belgian authorities went on one hell of a spring cleaning sentencing 2940 traitors and other war criminals to death and putting 242 up against the wall - commuting the rest to mostly life imprisonment).

This could be effective. If this Leftist attempt at revolution fails - there should be no mercy for them whatsoever: line them all up. They've earned it. Better shoot every single Leftist who surrenders or they will try again at a later date. Two civil wars is enough.

[Smaland]

Before I say anything else, please read the following, and take it to heart: for now at least, keep your index finger outside of the trigger guard, be content with "carrying your rifle over your shoulder".

Now is a time for preparation. Don't mess it up by committing terrorist acts or any other crimes; keep your skirts clean. Find friends you absolutely can trust, form your own group, and start to drill. Unite with other Forest Brothers groups in other parts of Europe, and work together; name your own group whatever you want. It goes without saying that you need to take care and avoid recruiting a Kim Philby into your group. A number of the original Forest Brothers were betrayed to the Soviets by Philby.

If you can bring yourselves to do it, let the Left start the shooting, so that everyone knows who the bad guys are. You could always finish it later.

What's happening in America can occur in Europe at any time.

If the Left gets enough news reports of unidentified persons practicing at impromptu rifle ranges in the forests, then who knows ... maybe they'll stand down, and then you could go after them through the legal system.

The difference between now and the 1940's-1950's is that there are many, many more people in all parts of Europe. If enough Europeans join a Forest Brothers organization, and they are unified, then you could win, if the Left decides to start a shooting war.

I'm chronically ill, and so the best thing I can do is to get in front of my computer as often as I can.

There are already Forest Brothers in America, we just call them militias.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5rQFp7FF9c

[Morena]

I don't think Hispanics in the US are that well-organized or homogenous yet to participate in (nation-wide, organized) riots.

[Smaland]

Another option would counter-propaganda. The Belgian authorities did just that during the German invasion of 1940 to make sure that the Dutch-speaking Flemish and French-speaking Walloons couldn't be pitted against each other by the invader. They warned the civilian population for German propaganda and against local activists. It was quite successful as local civilians often handed over activists to the Belgian police and army. Those 18 days and some more days in France ended up as the worst days in the lives of those activists - until after the war that is (as the Belgian authorities went on one hell of a spring cleaning sentencing 2940 traitors and other war criminals to death and putting 242 up against the wall - commuting the rest to mostly life imprisonment).

This could be effective. If this Leftist attempt at revolution fails - there should be no mercy for them whatsoever: line them all up. They've earned it. Better shoot every single Leftist who surrenders or they will try again at a later date. Two civil wars is enough.

Yes. For me, telling the truth about Communists is good counter-propaganda.

[Ülev]

Russians also plans revolution or war
https://youtu.be/vVh0rmoTxH0
for example taking Belarus and Ukraine back, according to the words of that man in uniform

[Smaland]

Message to the people in America who are sitting on the fence; or else, to those who care only for themselves, who want to know what's in it for them:

Even if only for pragmatic reasons, you might as well join the counterrevolution, today.

If the Communists win, there's no guarantee that you'd be able to carve out an acceptable life for yourself simply by showing unconditional loyalty to a Bolshevik regime. If you say the wrong thing even only once, you just might be a dead man.

Trotsky was one of the "lights" of Communism in the early days of the Soviet Union, but he died in exile in 1940 after a hit man put an ax into his head; he had gotten on the wrong side of Stalin.

During the Holodomor of 1932-33, Stalin murdered millions of Ukrainians with a man-made famine. What threat was a Ukrainian child to Stalin?

During the Great Purge of 1936-38, dozens of general and flag officers in the Soviet military were murdered by Stalin's men; their profession and ability were no shield for them.

Are you willing to bet your very life that there would never be a Stalin or a Mao Zedong, that the only rulers you'd ever see would be benevolent dictators? Communism's track record is very bad on this point. If it comes to this, better to die in battle than to live under a Communist regime. Being blown to bits by an artillery shell is a better fate than being worked to death in a gulag.

[Smaland]

"The most significant aspect of Communist expansion since 1945 is the fact that it has not been accomplished by traditional military force. These countries [referring to countries in Eastern Europe] were not conquered by external invasion of Soviet troops, but by internal terrorism, revolution, and subversion by people who were citizens of each target nation."

The photo is from conservativedailynews d com. The photo caption above and the section below are both quotations of G. Edward Griffin's narration in the film documentary The Subversion Factor . The photo caption is a quotation of video section 4:11-4:35, and the section below is a quotation of video section 4:36-6:28.

In 1967, Soviet Premier Brezhnev said

Marxist-Leninists have always understood that socialism cannot be implanted by one country into another by military force, that it is the product of the internal development of a given society.

Brezhnev's predecessor, Nikita Khrushchev, was even more explicit when he said

I am convinced that tomorrow the red flag will fly over the United States. But, we will not fly the flag. It will be the American people themselves [that remains to be seen, and I wouldn't have anything at all to do with it].

The historical record is clear: the prime directive of Communist strategy is conquest from within.

The second most important lesson to be learned is that, at the time of takeover, the actual number of Communists in any country is usually less than 3% ... in many cases, such as the Soviet Union itself, it has been less than 1% of the total population.

The place to begin this inquiry, therefore, is to examine the strategy by which a tiny minority can capture control of an existing government.

The success of this strategy has been largely the result of two factors working together. One is the mobilization of mass action among the non-Communist population; demonstrations, general strikes, or insurrection. The other is the paralysis of the target government; the inability to fight back effectively, indecision, delays, [and] blunders.

It's not surprising, therefore, to learn that a major part of Communist strategy is devoted to techniques for creating exactly these two conditions: mobilization of the masses, and paralysis of the government.