0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,347 Given: 369 |
It was 2018, so not too long ago. There was elections going on there, some ALMO craze everywhere. I been to columbia briefly. I also visit the USA, in SW and the Midwest (where there are lots of reservations). Not much in SE Asia, it was only malaysia. I was horrified when I learned that they do FGM/Female circumcision there. Very strange for an Asian population to practice such things. lots of anti-chinese sentiment also at that time
Thumbs Up |
Received: 58,164 Given: 58,938 |
There is no single answer it depends on the viewer but according to the American race census it will be more interracial than Mena and European because native and Asian are two different boxes Mena and European is the same box I don't have a opinion myself and will try to understand and follow the mainstream conclusions
My AncestryDNA autosomal results [yes it is a link click on it]
"For wise and good men always feel disinclined to hurt those that are of much less strength than themselves"
"Truth and Virtue do not necessarily belong to wealth and Power and distinctions of big mansions"
"To abuse and insult, is inconsistent with reason and justice"
- The Prophet of Indian Nationalism Raja Ram Mohan Roy
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,347 Given: 369 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Natives and Asiatics are much more genetically divergent from MENAs and Europeans though. In fact, even Indians are genetically closer to Euros than Natives are to Asiatics.
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post6704067
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post6702325
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,495 Given: 884 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,301 Given: 8,227 |
Yeah, of course. Old anthropologists just didn't know any better so they lumped them both into 'mongoloid' category, but they aren't in fact that related. Sure, they can sometimes look similar, but that's not what actual taxonomy is about - this is what matters:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Anyway to answer your question, yes it is definitely interracial. Natives are like much more genetically divergent from Asiatics than MENAs/West Asians are to Europeans. Heck, even low caste Indians are genetically closer to Euros than Natives are to Mongoloids. Not to mentioned that Natives have like 30-40% or a bit more ANE, something that most Mongoloids totally lack (except Siberians and predominantly Mong Central Asians like Kyrgyz, Kazakh)
Compare the Pima to Asiatics and Saudi to Europeans for example. Saudis are a lot closer to Euros than Pimas are to East Asians and other Mongoloids. What's interesting is that Saudis are genetically closer to Semitic Horners (Eritrean, Ethiopian_Amhara) who have around 40-50% SSA and Uzbeks than to Saami, Mari who are fellow West Eurasians. Also its funny that Pimas are genetically closer to Udmurt, Saami, Bonda, an Austroasiatic tribe from India who are predominantly AASI+East Asian than to Dai and Luzon who are their East Asian distant relatives.
Distance to: Pima
0.45975611 KAZ_Botai
0.46300918 Altaian
0.47118075 Yukagir_Tundra
0.47360288 Selkup
0.47884474 Ket
0.48787109 Hazara
0.48935916 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
0.50309788 Sherpa
0.50901470 JPN_Jomon
0.51351575 Japanese
0.52262922 Aeta
0.52624117 Onge
0.53825127 Malay
0.54085591 Udmurt
0.54117949 BRA_Botocudo
0.54205427 Saami
0.54504231 Bonda
0.54699183 Dai
0.54997681 PYF_150BP
0.55374472 Bengali_Bangladesh
0.55549131 Luzon
0.57200270 Paniya
Distance to: Saudi
0.15197387 Armenian
0.16857465 Moroccan_North
0.19121905 Italian_Tuscany
0.19847539 Georgian_Imer
0.21439730 Chechen
0.22132502 Sardinian
0.24172959 Balochi
0.24394825 Tajik
0.27274742 Swedish
0.28134093 Eritrean
0.30341334 Ethiopian_Amhara
0.31620189 Uzbek
0.31743306 Udmurt
0.32890942 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
0.33647123 Saami
0.34493352 Mari
0.35368390 Punjabi_Lahore
0.36718953 Velamas
0.37880377 Bengali_Bangladesh
0.38220435 Somali
0.42176673 RUS_Samara_HG
0.49942959 WHG
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,704 Given: 5,603 |
Can you link me the study? I would thought Ket, Selkup would be the closest relatives of Natives.
You could be right though: Pima, an Amerindian tribe from SW USA/Northern Mexico. Chukchis, Koryaks are even closer than Selkup, Ket. What's peculiar though is Altaian and Kazakh who are Turkic Central Asians are also closer to Pima than Ket, Selkup. I wonder why...
Distance to: Pima
0.36647084 Chukchi
0.41854493 Koryak
0.45975611 KAZ_Botai
0.46300918 Altaian
0.47118075 Yukagir_Tundra
0.47170680 Kazakh
0.47360288 Selkup
0.47884474 Ket
0.48787109 Hazara
0.48935916 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
0.50309788 Sherpa
0.50901470 JPN_Jomon
0.51351575 Japanese
0.52262922 Aeta
0.52624117 Onge
0.53825127 Malay
0.54085591 Udmurt
0.54117949 BRA_Botocudo
0.54205427 Saami
0.54504231 Bonda
0.54699183 Dai
0.54997681 PYF_150BP
0.55374472 Bengali_Bangladesh
0.55549131 Luzon
0.57200270 Paniya
Same thing with the Surui: Chukchi, Koryak closer than Ket, Selkup.
Distance to: Surui
0.45144807 Chukchi
0.50381745 Koryak
0.53161020 KAZ_Botai
0.55156500 Altaian
0.55528829 Yukagir_Tundra
0.55907543 Selkup
0.55926897 Kazakh
0.56170177 Ket
0.57265833 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
0.57328313 Hazara
0.58726398 Sherpa
0.58932856 JPN_Jomon
0.59467301 Japanese
0.60032053 Aeta
0.60447868 Onge
0.61563785 Malay
0.61677137 BRA_Botocudo
0.61727473 Udmurt
0.61745215 Saami
0.62104489 Bonda
0.62442478 Dai
0.62713080 PYF_150BP
0.62957509 Bengali_Bangladesh
0.63061934 Luzon
0.64498427 Paniya
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks