| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 24 Given: 7 |
Is East med considered as a Semitic phenotype?
Is East med considered as a Semitic phenotype? Or not?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
No one is using "East Med" more. Now they are using or Pontid and or Orientalid to some specific cases.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 24 Given: 7 |
What do you mean by that? This type doesn't exist?Originally Posted by Sacrificed Ram
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 24 Given: 7 |
East med and Pontid are not the same
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Yes. East Med doesn't exist, It should be a Pontid with Orientalid hints.
Just see how Natufians remnants are classified as just "mediterraneans".
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 11,492 Given: 8,741 |
So you ll tell me they looked exactly like Iberians?
Of course not. Only their skull was Med, but they would propably have a Litorid and East Med in pheno.
To OP: Semitic populations are propably more Orientalid shifted as a whole. Armenoid, East Alpine are also common, East Med however too.
Last edited by Immanenz; 06-19-2020 at 03:14 PM.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,385 Given: 2,854 |
No such phenotype exists. What's considered "East Med" is simply some Med type laced with some Syrid or Orientalid hints.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Yes, they were atlantomediterraneans, the development of Orientalid ("semitic" like) features is posterior, Early Neolithic and definitive only in Bronze Age.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 11,492 Given: 8,741 |
well, then how Natuufian like pople look completel different to Iberians?
they were Gracile Med- Litorid, thats also how non Orientalid people look with high Natufian. Atlanto Med is rare outside of Europe- some NA can look like it, but this is mostly because of EEF
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Younger Dryas.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks