(((Davidski)))

[Deusex99]

Imagine trusting this charlatan. It took me 10 minutes to find out that he is not using academic samples. I went on his (((blog))) and asked him about that. He simply refused to respond and cancelled my post. The absolute state of (((Eurogenes))).

[Deusex99]

You can check the ID here.

Compare the fam file from the paper Raveane et al 2019 and the G25 Italian text file.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gyN...TC_5AMhJ3/view

https://www.dropbox.com/s/i3xpko28yi...Omni25ChipData

I can't post this on Anthrogenica because I'm banned for an unrelated reason.

[gixajo]

You can check the ID here.

Compare the fam file from the paper Raveane et al 2019 and the G25 Italian text file.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gyN...TC_5AMhJ3/view

https://www.dropbox.com/s/i3xpko28yi...Omni25ChipData

I can't post this on Anthrogenica because I'm banned for an unrelated reason.

If he has good judgment in choosing representative samples, what is the problem that not all samples he uses come from academic studies?

Take all this for what it is, a simplified tool for amateurs.

[Deusex99]

If he has good judgment in choosing representative samples, what is the problem that not all samples he uses come from academic studies?

Take all this for what it is, a simplified tool for amateurs.

Nice mental gymnastic there.

Science is not a matter of "interpretation" or "preference". Science is a matter of facts.

There is a clear manipulation of genetic data going on there and the fact that (((Polako))) behaves like a Jew shows how much he is really "reliable".

[JamesBond007]

Nice mental gymnastic there.

Science is not a matter of "interpretation" or "preference". Science is a matter of facts.

There is a clear manipulation of genetic data going on there and the fact that (((Polako))) behaves like a Jew shows how much he is really "reliable".

Since when does academia have a monopoly on science ? Your whole argument against Davidski is the opposite of science since it conforms to the logical fallacy of the argumentum ad verecundiam. He may in fact be manipulating data in a non-scientific fashion but you have not proven it logically. One might even make the argument that academic sources are more likely to be legit but that is not what you are saying here.

[Kamal900]

So..where is the evidence that he's Jewish btw? Love the troll and butthurt thread about your distaste for G25. Yes, it's not a perfect sampling for certain groups and so on, but the G25 in itself is a pretty good tool regardless on the sampling coordinates.

[gixajo]

Nice mental gymnastic there.

Science is not a matter of "interpretation" or "preference". Science is a matter of facts.

There is a clear manipulation of genetic data going on there and the fact that (((Polako))) behaves like a Jew shows how much he is really "reliable".

Alors, mets vos propres conseils en pratique ,

behaves like a Jew shows how much he is really "reliable"

ou

Imagine trusting this charlatan. It took me 10 minutes to find out that he is not using academic samples. I went on his (((blog))) and asked him about that. He simply refused to respond and cancelled my post. The absolute state of (((Eurogenes))).

,ceux ne sont pas non plus des arguments scientifiques, ni les disqualifications subjectives dans votre premier post. Cela semble plus à quelque chose de personnel qu'une allégation en défense de la science.

Si vous n'aimez pas les résultats que ces outils d'estimation vous ont donnés, vous feriez mieux de jardiner pendant votre temps libre.

Ici nous connaissons tous la confiance que ces choses méritent, donc je ne comprends pas comment vous prenez quelque chose que je vous ai déjà dit si sérieusement.Dans nos mains ce n'est qu'un outil pour amateurs. Et si vous n'aimez pas certains samples, supprimez-les du datasheet.

[waam]

((()))

[FinalFlash]

So..where is the evidence that he's Jewish btw? Love the troll and butthurt thread about your distaste for G25. Yes, it's not a perfect sampling for certain groups and so on, but the G25 in itself is a pretty good tool regardless on the sampling coordinates.

The tool itself is wonderful. Probably the best amateur tool available for us to use thus far but some of the default population references can be a little off.

[Slavic Italian]

Imagine trusting this charlatan. It took me 10 minutes to find out that he is not using academic samples. I went on his (((blog))) and asked him about that. He simply refused to respond and cancelled my post. The absolute state of (((Eurogenes))).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3bl...Uk_3f4&index=2