Activist: “Take Down ALL Images of Jesus: all murals and stained glass”

[Luso]

The first realistic depictions of Jesus as light haired and very Euro looking, and the basic depiction we still recognise, came from Italian renaissance art in the 14th and 15th centuries, not from Northern Europeans.

Italians always loved the lighter phenotypes, I mean germanics kings were meta to them

[Luso]

You are such a bastard I cant believe it.

Take down any public image of Jesus or support it you are a enemy.

I hope people that try this die painfully.

Man this forum is filled with some Euro cucks that moved to the US thinking they are cosmopolitan.

Haha, calm down man. I don't think they should take them down but this rlly isn't that deep... I understand different cultures and peoples depict Jesus differently. At first, the Italians made him North West looking and many people still do, on the other hand other people see him as dark hair, dark eyes, and euro caucasian looking (most accurate depiction) then Africans make him black, etc etc. it's perception no one truly knows what he looked like for 100% certainty.

[Mixdguy17]

First of all, no, this guy is too old to be Jesus. Second, this is how ancient Middle Easterners depicted Jesus:


Looks like a Mediterranean white person to me.

I think this is a good representation imo. Do u know the name of that piece?

[Smeagol]

I think this is a good representation imo. Do u know the name of that piece?

It's the oldest known Christ Pantocrator Icon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ...crator_(Sinai)

[Teutone]

Haha, calm down man. I don't think they should take them down but this rlly isn't that deep... I understand different cultures and peoples depict Jesus differently. At first, the Italians made him North West looking and many people still do, on the other hand other people see him as dark hair, dark eyes, and euro caucasian looking (most accurate depiction) then Africans make him black, etc etc. it's perception no one truly knows what he looked like for 100% certainty.

The catholic church allows Koreans to display him as Korean, why?

Cause that helps to rely with him and his phenotype is no important topic to ANY christian.

I dont think Jesus was blonde ofc not, God knew his son had to be born in Israel at that specific time and his gospel spread around the world.

What Shaun King wants is to tear down the images of our lord and it still sounds to me in ur first post, that you support it.

[AmeriCanadian]

Figures. I finally find Jesus but past the time when it was okay to be Christian. Always late to every party, I am. Eyeroll! Back to praying to God to save us from Marxist tripe and the CCP.

[pompandy]

Could u elaborate on this? I would love to learn more of this.

Modern palestinians have like 10% of Subsaharan blood, also their have liek 40% of Arabian or North African blood
Palestinian

Sidon_BA,82.8
BedouinB,9.6
Ethiopia_4500BP,7.6

From a study: Near Eastern populations, correspondingly, the Southwest Asian/Caucasian component rises to ∼50% and the Arabian/North African cluster decreases to ∼20–30%, even in Palestinians (similar to the Samaritans and some of the Druze), highlighting their primarily indigenous origin, with the most extreme values for the Druze, carrying the Southwest Asian/Caucasian component at ∼80%

[pompandy]

Maronite Christians are probably a good modern day example of what he looked like, although he may have been slightly lighter than them. I'd say he looked like a modern day Greek but slightly darker and more levantine

I don't think that he was darker than average of modern Greeks, Jesus was a ENF/CHG, I think his CHG(peaks in Georgians) would make him at least in pair with them, also he and his people were mountain people that would make them "light", Israeli Arab Christians overlap genetically with Cypriots, so I would say he was most likely like a Cypriot

[Loki]

Modern palestinians have like 10% of Subsaharan blood, also their have liek 40% of Arabian or North African blood
Palestinian

Sidon_BA,82.8
BedouinB,9.6
Ethiopia_4500BP,7.6

From a study: Near Eastern populations, correspondingly, the Southwest Asian/Caucasian component rises to ∼50% and the Arabian/North African cluster decreases to ∼20–30%, even in Palestinians (similar to the Samaritans and some of the Druze), highlighting their primarily indigenous origin, with the most extreme values for the Druze, carrying the Southwest Asian/Caucasian component at ∼80%

Just remember modern Palestinians are not genetically identical to people who lived there 2,000 years ago. Subsaharan blood likely introgressed over the years, and would have been much less 2000 years ago, if not absent.

[pompandy]

Just remember modern Palestinians are not genetically identical to people who lived there 2,000 years ago. Subsaharan blood likely introgressed over the years, and would have been much less 2000 years ago, if not absent.

Yeah, also a study from this year found that Central Levantines were from 14% to even someones being mostly Greek/Anatolian DNA, like in the V Century before Jesus. So Western Central Levant(Galilee) was not only lesser Subsaharan and without Arab blood like modern Palestinians but They also had a "lot" of Southeast European/Anatolian ancestry. Basically they were indistinguishable from modern Cypriots and also close to Anatolians and some Greek Islanders.