Most unfortunately located countries?

[eatensemn]

I think top of the list should be armenia. Small and landlocked. West side is turkey, border is closed and heavily guarded by turkey. East side is azerbaijan, clash zone; there's an ongoing low-density war. South iran, which is another muslim country and also population around the border mostly turkic. Georgia in the north is a christian country but has bitter relations with russia, which is father of armenia, so that way is also not reliable. Result= one of the poorest countries in the world, very low life standards.

[JohnnyP]

Macedonia, Crete and Epirus were liberated in 1912. The rest of the mainland and the Islands were all liberated until 1880.

And I'm not trying to downplay Greek-Serbian friendly relations, don't worry.

BrotherChe, something to be liberated needs to be occupied before, there were lived indigous people Macedonians.So in 1912-1913 these regions were OCCUPIED not Liberated...

[Zeno]

BrotherChe, something to be liberated needs to be occupied before, there were lived indigous people Macedonians.So in 1912-1913 these regions were OCCUPIED not Liberated...

Yeah... 50k in a province which had 1,3 million in times of Liberation... 75% of the population of Macedonia were Greeks and Greek muslim converts and another 20% were Turks.

[Lazio]

There is no any conflict between China and Mongolia, non of them hate each other.

That is a good joke. Show me a Mongolian that is neutral to Chinese... really. All I talked with deeply dislike them, both from UB or countryside. Inner Mongolia may be another story, but I'm not talking about them...

[alnortedelsur]

Israel. All surrounded by enemies.

[Lazio]

Wrong. This is a common misconception about Russia.
Russians are majority of the population even in far eastern parts.
https://i.redd.it/vc6hnxib85821.png
Eastern Russia has its native people but their number was low so Russian and Ukrainians settlers from West easily outnumbered them...

Why wrong? Read my post again, I didn't throw numbers to begin with.
Anyhow I do disagree with that, simply because any data like this (that the results might influence on the "patriotism" or "order" of the nation) from a government like Russia (Soviet or post-Soviet) is bullshit to me. Sure, there are ethinic Russians even in Mongolian and Kazakh cities... I do know/recognise that there are ethinic Russians in the Eastern part of "Russia"... but I don't believe they are "more than 80%" for any part there (or maybe they can really be - because of the cities, but if we take the countryside alone the majority still are the Asians - and in case of a conflict, nomads could do much better in a vast land that they can live anywhere, than people from cities that don't have the skills to go on the wild life (I'm focusing on the thread here) - so lets take any state/area/region of 3 cities/towns or so, in those towns they can have 80% of Slavs and 20% of Central Asians and all towns together will have a much higher population than the countryside... but they are surrounded by C. Asians nomad groups that occupy much more space in the state/area traveling arround all the time... so the state is filled with which group? Even if we embrace the data, it's a matter of perspective). In any case I will avoid to go on on what I believe and how I see the situation, because I cannot offer you any other data on it... so lets all believe for a moment in the percentages from their data and also don't use any "special" point of view on it, just the brute "fact": "Slavs are vastly majority on most areas/provinces in Russia"... that STILL wouldn't make what I said wrong (for instance, when a murican says "our country is filled by illegals" they are not saying "illegals are more than 50% of our population") and still wouldn't change what I said about the situation of Mongolia (because anyway they see Slavs as friends and they are not really city people so they wont try to gather with the people from the cities to begin with, they would rather gather with the others of the countryside).
So, thanks for Ivanistan's data, it's always interesting to see those things, but don't be so quick to lable things without at least giving some time to analyse it.

[Lazio]

Israel. All surrounded by enemies.

"As you sow so shall you reap" -Rodrigo Duterte

[Hawkguy]

Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, South Sudan, the Francophone part of Africa, Bangladesh... There will always be instability, be it political, social and economic caused for countries that like to maintain their hegemony.

Nepal is between two regional powers (India and China).

North Korea because it has to endure having one neighbor listening to kpop. But seriously, I don't see the tensions between the Koreas ending anytime soon. And it must be problematic for South Korea having to listen that their brother every week threatening to blow up the world with the weapon of dialogue (Nuclear bomb, because rich countries don't care about you until you have a nuclear weapon).

[Lazio]

Nepal is between two regional powers (India and China).

The only power India have is to annoy people with their English accent.

[Tooting Carmen]

Israel. All surrounded by enemies.

In part out of their own making, and I am saying that as someone who is mildly pro-Israel. Not to mention that it has been at peace with Egypt and Jordan since the 1980's, of course.