Well the proof is in the results. When we did the Kurd and Pashtun samples Baloch/Brahui were not in the top of the list but when we reversed it and did a table for Brahui all of a sudden Kurds and Pashtuns are in the top. Read that technical paper I linked it's helpful. Also google "genetic bottleneck" or "genetic drift".
I have a beautiful example that will make it clear to you.
Going by the previous example I gave suppose for simplification Sulaimaniya in Kurdistan only has 10 kurds and these are there genotypes for a certain SNP. You'll notice the allele frequency for the "A" allele at rs853697 is 70% for these Kurds
SNP |
Kurd1 |
Kurd2 |
Kurd3 |
Kurd4 |
Kurd5 |
Kurd6 |
Kurd7 |
Kurd8 |
Kurd9 |
Kurd10 |
Allele Frequency “A” allele |
rs853697 |
A |
A |
C |
A |
C |
A |
A |
A |
C |
A |
7/10 or 70% |
Now supposing Kurd3, Kurd4, Kurd5 decide to go to an uninhabited island
SNP |
Kurd3 |
Kurd4 |
Kurd5 |
Allele Frequency “A” allele |
rs853697 |
C |
A |
C |
1/3 or 30% |
You'll notice that the Kurds on the island have a totally different allele frequency than the Kurds that remained behind. Now you can do the table for all the other positions in the genome.
After 2000 years admixture calculator will show totally different profile for them even though they never mixed with anyone.
Bookmarks