| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 23,081 Given: 56,859 |
How feasible is terraforming Mars?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,346 Given: 1,328 |
Highly unlikely.Originally Posted by Oneeye
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,451 Given: 7,901 |
I hope that by 2035 we'll have developed technology to a degree we can travel by the speed of light.
"Why should I fear death? If I am, death is not. If death is, I am not"
- Επίκουρος
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 8,924 Given: 2,964 |
You would need to change the laws of physics for that. Nothing can reach to the speed of light.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 6,245 Given: 1,444 |
Even in a biodome ?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 17,901 Given: 18,310 |
All the mountain land on Mars has been claimed by Vlachs for sheep grazing.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,451 Given: 7,901 |
To reach the speed of light, or at least approach it, you need unlimited energy. The only source of energy for humans that can provide unlimited energy is nuclear. We can utilise it. The issue here is, how to stabilise it on a spacecraft.
"Why should I fear death? If I am, death is not. If death is, I am not"
- Επίκουρος
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 8,924 Given: 2,964 |
First of all, to reach the speed of light, you would need INFINITE energy. Even if you used all the atoms in the universe for nuclear energy, that would still not be infinite, therefore wouldn't be enough to make even a single Proton travel at the speed of light. It's basically impossible to travel at the speed of light, no matter how hard you try.
Secondly, Nuclear energy is not unlimited, where does this idea come from? Even Stars (which are fueled by nuclear reactions) die out at some point.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,346 Given: 1,328 |
Martian surface is pretty toxic. Perchlorates and all...Even in a biodome ?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,168 Given: 4,757 |
Don't underestimate Space X.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Türkiye
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks