R1a-Z93 > Z2125 (Lots of new samples added to the tree)

[Chelubey]

Very funny. Turan were just non-Persian East Iranics thats it. Brahmins also called Persians non-Aryans does that make them Turkic too?.

However, Sogdians (eastern Iranians) and Khorezmians, as well as the inhabitants of the territory of Afghanistan, are counted among the Aryans. And there is not a single reference that they are Turanians. Undoubtedly, the modern interpretation of the terms Turanians and Turan is illogical. Possibly , the border of Turan was between Amu Darya and Syr Darya and Turanians were only Saka-like nomads . The border of Turan was mobile due to confrontation between Turan and Iran.
Later, during Turkic expansions, the border of the Turan significantly advanced to the South, and just at that time the territory of Sogdiana can be called Turan(partly).
The Map of Ariana according to Eratosthenes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariana

Turks are from a historical point of view recent in the region and not even directly related to the Pre-Indo-European East Eurasian populations of the region who were rather ANE-shifted like WSHG.

If you talk that Turks were recent and if you know the genetics of Proto-Turks, you can easily identify archaeological culture that was Proto-Turkic. This is very logical. So, from which archaeological culture did proto-Turk expansion begin?