What is your feeling towards male victims of domestic violence?

[Seya]

what type of domestic violence? i can't imagine a woman beating up a man

[Kamal900]

Actually... it's not so simple for men to defend themselves as the courts are against us: the moment a man puts his foot down, he will be arrested and sent off to jail after a kangaroo court while the woman gets to take everything including the shirt of his back.

That's the dangers of neo-liberalism. Yes, a man can't defend himself in court thanks to the feminist corruption in both court and law of the land.

[Götterfunke]

I find it highly ridiculous and hipocritical that society accepts females slapping males but at the same time men hitting back is unacceptable. This shit is also promoted in movies.

The reason why males let females slap them is not because they are physically, but mentally and psychologically stronger.

Physical inferiority does not give you the right to do stupid things. A weak guy that hits a bodybuilder will get hit back.

However, while mental inferiority and emotional instability do not give you any rights per say, people will be more tolerant towards you. They will be inclined to defend and protect you.

Would you hit a child? Of course not. Even if that child would slap you, you would try to de-escalate the situation rather than hit back with full force.

We don't attack the child not because of its physical inferiority, but because of its mental, emotional inferiority and instability.

This is the same reason why women are allowed to hit guys, and why guys ideally don't hit back.

[Aldaris]

Actually... it's not so simple for men to defend themselves as the courts are against us: the moment a man puts his foot down, he will be arrested and sent off to jail after a show trial by a kangaroo court while the woman gets to take everything including the shirt off his back.

As for the court bias, I agree in general, but most cases won't (or wouldln't) even end up in there. Anyhow, a woman won't do such stuff unless she feels there's something wrong with the man - they are far less aggresive than we are. The reason behind most of this issue is that the men who push women to such behaviors are exactly the ones who are going to tolerate it. No matter how we spin it, it's a part of our job to put them in line and them being violent against us is an instance of a failure to do so. Sure there are exceptions, but that's the general pattern.

[The Lawspeaker]

As for the court bias, I agree in general, but most cases won't (or wouldln't) even end up in there. Anyhow, a woman won't do such stuff unless she feels there's something wrong with the man - they are far less aggresive than we are. The reason behind most of this issue is that the men who push women to such behaviors are exactly the ones who are going to tolerate it. No matter how we spin it, it's a part of our job to put them in line and them being violent against us is an instance of a failure to do so. Sure there are exceptions, but that's the general pattern.

I actually think that the underlying reason is much darker than that: they know they will get away with it. No... actually it's worse: they do it for profit. Profit because they will only benefit from it as their behaviour is both socially (violence against men is socially approved) and legally (after all - the man doesn't stand a chance) endorsed and it's used for financial gain because they will get to rob him clean. I have said this a million times on this forum: if you want a certain behaviour to prevail throughout society, you subsidise and propagate it. This can be used for good as well as for evil and the current trend is definitely pure evil.

[Aldaris]

This is the same reason why women are allowed to hit guys, and why guys ideally don't hit back.

Germany needs more Germans like Teutone.

You don't go a fucking overkill, but you're not gonna stay still either. Simple as that.

[Kamal900]

I actually think that the underlying reason is much darker than that: they know they will get away with it. Both socially (violence against men is socially approved) and legally (after all - the man doesn't stand a chance) as well as financially because they will get to rob him clean.

No offence but the men in the west are treated no differently than how women are treated in Saudi Arabia..but much more Orwellian than that. Look what happened to Robin Williams and the three vultures aka his ex-wives that were circling around him for money. There was an American white father that was forced to pay up over 100,000 dollars for child support. He fled to Saudi Arabia and converted to Islam.

[The Lawspeaker]

No offence but the men in the west are treated no differently than how women are treated in Saudi Arabia..but much more Orwellian than that. Look what happened to Robin Williams and the three vultures aka his ex-wives that were circling around him for money. There was an American white father that was forced to pay up over 100,000 dollars for child support. He fled to Saudi Arabia and converted to Islam.

Exactly and, honestly, I don't blame him. I believe that the current system has been put in place DELIBERATELY in order to destroy whatever relations still existed between white men and white women and to destroy any and all white birth rates by turning white women into little more than school yard bullies. To put it bluntly: feminism is nothing but another tool for white genocide.

[Mingle]

The reason why males let females slap them is not because they are physically, but mentally and psychologically stronger.

Physical inferiority does not give you the right to do stupid things. A weak guy that hits a bodybuilder will get hit back.

However, while mental inferiority and emotional instability do not give you any rights per say, people will be more tolerant towards you. They will be inclined to defend and protect you.

Would you hit a child? Of course not. Even if that child would slap you, you would try to de-escalate the situation rather than hit back with full force.

We don't attack the child not because of its physical inferiority, but because of its mental, emotional inferiority and instability.

This is the same reason why women are allowed to hit guys, and why guys ideally don't hit back.

Nobody thinks "this woman is mentally inferior so it's beneath me to hit her". The reason men don't hit women is cause they're physically much weaker. If women hit men, it won't hurt since they're so much weaker, so it's not seen as much of a big deal.

[Götterfunke]

Nobody thinks "this woman is mentally inferior so it's beneath me to hit her". The reason men don't hit women is cause they're physically much weaker. If women hit men, it won't hurt since they're so much weaker, so it's not seen as much of a big deal.

Physical inferiority, as I have proven, does not give you the right to hit someone. Mental inferiority or emotional instability, however, at least gives you an explaination.

It does not make sense to accept a slap from a woman solely by the fact that she's physically inferior, because if a small, weak guy slaps a big, strong guy, that weak guy gets slapped back.

The reason we don't slap women, again, is the same why we would never slap a child-that child is not only physically, but also mentally inferior, and also emotionally unstable.

All other explainations would not be logically consistent.

To me it does not matter what people think, it matters only what can be proposed and defended on a logical level.