How white is Chile?

[Cristiano viejo]

Dude, most Euro looking people in Latin America don't score 100% European. This is not Australia, USA, Canada or New Zealand.

Irrelevant, even if false.

[Chile Raptor]

Aclárate, o son blancos o están mezclados.
Si son blancos, son blancos. Si no son blancos, son como Chile.

Cierra el culo de una vez, moro de mierda

[Latinus]

Irrelevant, even if false.

False? LOL. It's the reality.

And if it's so irrelevant, why are you commenting?

[Latinus]

Cierra el culo de una vez, moro de mierda

[Cristiano viejo]

False? LOL. It's the reality.

And if it's so irrelevant, why are you commenting?

False because there are hundreds of thousands or even millions of pure European-in origin Argentinians and Uruguayans. Argentano is one, for example.

And it is not relevant because none in this world is 100%euro, as I stated you with the example of Russians or Greeks. Neither Americans or Australians.

And in any case, I was comparing Argentina and Uruguay with chile. But really it is not comparable. While in the first two the majority is white, 100% euro or very very near, the majority in chile is plain mestizo.

[Chile Raptor]

Irrelevant, even if false.

Argentina y Uruguay son más blancos que Chile por un margen del 15 % al 20 %, no más, y promedian más Afro que Chile...entonces no se de donde los consideras puros y blancos...en el caso de Uruguay, llega hasta el 8% de aporte Afro...Argentina un 5 %, Chile no llega ni al 1 %

[Chile Raptor]

Wassup

[Latinus]

False because there are hundreds of thousands or even millions of pure European-in origin Argentinians and Uruguayans. Argentano is one, for example.

Did I deny that there is a sizable minority of pure Euros in South America? The thing is: most white Argentinians, Uruguayans, Brazilians, etc., aren't pure Euro. The only New World populations with majority pure white populations are: USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Not even South African whites are pure.

Argentano is fully descendant of recent Italic immigrants, right? That explains why he is fully Euro. But most Argentinians/Uruguayans, diferently from him, have colonial ancestry, and colonial ancestry in Latam = mixed race genetics.

If Argentina hadn't received post-colonial Euro immigration, the proportion of pure whites would be very small, since colonial Argentina was mainly in the mestizo spectrum.

And it is not relevant because none in this world is 100%euro, as I stated you with the example of Russians or Greeks. Neither Americans or Australians.

Dude, stop playing the disengaged, please. When I say 100% Euro genetically speaking, in the New World context, I mean that the ancestors of the white person, since they immigrated from the Old World/Europe, haven't mixed with Amerindians and/or SSA.

And in any case, I was comparing Argentina and Uruguay with chile. But really it is not comparable. While in the first two the majority is white, 100% euro or very very near, the majority in chile is plain mestizo.

Argentina and Uruguay are much whiter than Chile, but still... in neither Argentina and Uruguay you have a pure white majority. Most Argentinians/Uruguays are a mix of Old Stock Ancestry (Spanish + Amerindian) with recent Euro (mainly Spanish + Italian), so, it's obvious that most aren't 100% white, but still pred-Euro.

[santeño_oscuro]

Argentina y Uruguay son más blancos que Chile por un margen del 15 % al 20 %, no más, y promedian más Afro que Chile...entonces no se de donde los consideras puros y blancos...en el caso de Uruguay, llega hasta el 8% de aporte Afro...Argentina un 5 %, Chile no llega ni al 1 %

Tener un % de SSA residual no las hace menos blancas, siguen siendo notablemente más blancas que Chile. El mestizo y el indomestizo chileno pueden lucir Castizo o incluso blanco porque los mapuches eran los indígenas más claros y con cráneo más alargado

[Dove]

More than half of it, but not enough to consider the whole country as a White homeland.