0
Over the last years, a new generation of British historians have developed a new approach regarding the Crusades history.
The classical Catholic narrative was... you know... Nasty Turks overran Asia Minor after 1071 and innocent helpless Greeks had asked their Catholic friends some help.
British historians (Frankopan, etc) argue about that Catholic supremacist narrative and tell that the Crusades were a Catholic action, not primarily against Turks or the Muslims, but mainly aiming at wiping out Orthodoxy.
Actually, Byzantines were hiring both Turks and Normans in their armies as mercenaries. And since after 1050, the Catholic Normans started to sweep across Byzantine possessions in Italy, then Albania, the Greeks felt the urgent need to CALL TURKS FOR HELP. Actually it seems like thousands of Turks joined Byzantine forces and helped push Normans out of Greece at Larissa Battle.
British historians explain that after Suleyman's death, Seljuks of Anatolia who were in good terms with Greeks, stopped being under 'control' of the Byzantine emperor. And since Turks had pushed as west as to until Nicea, Greeks thought that Turks needed some corrections and asked Rome for some mercenaries.
But what Greeks got was an entire Crusading army, aiming at operating conquest for Latindom and which ultimately did not help Greeks recover their losses. A movement that shall finally aim at destroying the Orthodox in 1204.
Bookmarks