Question for Europeans: Do you consider Anglo Saxons the most advanced/evolved people?

[Rohanspiritual]

No ,in fact where i live people generally talk how UK society is less evolved than our own(i live in Sweden and the swedes think this)

What specifically about UK do they feel is less evolved than Sweden?

[Rohanspiritual]

If they were advanced would not have as mayor of their main city to a Paki, plus other cities, a partially Turk as president, their country ruled by Jews and full of immigrants, etc etc.

Yes, I dislike Anglos.

Which president is partial Turk?

Edit: nevermind, just found out you meant Boris

[Crn Volk]

No

[Ranger0075]

You should ask "which is the most superior european country after yours" in forums like this.

[oszkar07]

What do other Europeans generally think about Anglo Saxons, their achievements and culture.

Do you believe they are the most evolved people, and that their culture the most enlightened?

Do some even dislike Anglos?

I'm curious about the dynamic.

Britain certainly had its golden moments but I dont think this on the whole makes then as a population the most evolved and most enlightened.

They have their intelligent and capable people but they have a lot of dumbo's also.
Just look at behaviour of hordes of drunken Brits that holiday in the cheaper East Euro coastal destinations ... they vandalise a lot of property , destroy their hotel rooms , use any place as a toilet ... not really signs of high level individual development.

[JamesBond007]

Yes.

No , if you combine the Netherlands and Germany than it defeats the Anglo-Saxons. The Dutch and the Germans are more Germanic than the English hence we are superior. The Germans also had way more advanced technology during WWII than the Anglo-Saxons the Anglo-Saxons had to mostly rely on Jewish science except for Alan Turing etc..

[Luso]

I don't see why I should think such a thing? I mean historically the Greeks, Romans were the most advanced/evolved in implementing technological innovation, trading throughout Europe, and keeping it written in records (historically). Modern-day anglos have a sizable amount of advancement, but I will never consider them "superior".

[Rohanspiritual]

Britain certainly had its golden moments but I dont think this on the whole makes then as a population the most evolved and most enlightened.

They have their intelligent and capable people but they have a lot of dumbo's also.
Just look at behaviour of hordes of drunken Brits that holiday in the cheaper East Euro coastal destinations ... they vandalise a lot of property , destroy their hotel rooms , use any place as a toilet ... not really signs of high level individual development.

Yes I agree with the hoarders of fools they have as well.

It's very interesting to me the huge difference that exists between classes. Middle-Upper class people from the South seem to be very attractive, advanced and intelligent.

Then you get Northerners or lower class who look deformed in the face, as well as seeming dumb and repulsive.

I guess the English practiced Eugenics/Selective breeding between only their own classes for a long time, similar to Hindu Indians and Ashkenazi Jews

[gixajo]

Until they lose the hegemony that they still maintain (in the hands of the heirs of the British, the Americans), and after the most absolute failure they have to get up starting from scratch, I cannot consider Anglos more evolved than others like Greeks, Italians, Spaniards, Germans, Portugueses Russians, former countries of the Austro-Hungarian empire, or even Chinese, Japanese, Ottomans, or Arabs, who have all known defeat, after having known the success.

Because although the British have long since lost their empire, as I have said, the United States softened the blow of the fall and they have been like an extension of him, so they still do not consider themselves losers.

And to know defeat, I speak of seeing your country belittled, insulted, ridiculed, separated, oppressed, occupied, subdued for long enough so that even the last of its inhabitants has even wished that they had been born in another country.

When all this happens, they still begin to be truly European and begin to evolved.

I foresee many criticisms of this post, but I don't want to add more to the topic, so please don't start with ... "but ...", "nevertheless ...", "and what about ...?" no lists of great achievements of the Anglos etc.

Not to have felt complete defeat after success =no totally evolved.

[Incal]

If they were advanced would not have as mayor of their main city to a Paki, plus other cities, a partially Turk as president, their country ruled by Jews and full of immigrants, etc etc.

Yes, I dislike Anglos.

x2 lol

Sent from my Redmi Note 8 Pro using Tapatalk