Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Was Hiroshima Necessary?

  1. #1
    Veteran Member PHDNM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 06:23 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic
    Ethnicity
    French
    Country
    France
    Gender
    Posts
    12,414
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,121
    Given: 1,884

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Was Hiroshima Necessary?

    Was Hiroshima Necessary?

    Why the Atomic Bombings Could Have Been Avoided


    By Mark Weber


    Published: 1997-05-01


    On August 6, 1945, the world dramatically entered the atomic age: without either warning or precedent, an American plane dropped a single nuclear bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The explosion utterly destroyed more than four square miles of the city center. About about 90,000 people were killed immediately; another 40,000 were injured, many of whom died in protracted agony from radiation sickness. Three days later, a second atomic strike on the city of Nagasaki killed some 37,000 people and injured another 43,000. Together the two bombs eventually killed an estimated 200,000 Japanese civilians.


    https://codoh.com/library/document/w...-necessary/en/
    POUR UNE HISTOIRE DÉBARRASSÉE DES NOMBREUX MENSONGES
    Vincent Reynouard: Je suis ingénieur chimiste et historien révisionniste français. J’expose de la façon la plus pédagogique possible les arguments révisionnistes. Je propose, j’expose, je n’impose rien. Chacun doit (ou devrait) être libre de se faire une opinion sur le sujet. .


  2. #2
    account terminated.
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    09-18-2023 @ 03:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    48,373
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 52,721
    Given: 43,621

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Unertunately I'd say yes because Japan would not have surrendered and casualities (ground invasion of Japan) would be even much greater. Just my opinion which isn't necessarily correct.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member The Lawspeaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Online
    11-05-2023 @ 04:45 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Ancestry
    Brabant, Holland, Guelders and some Hainaut.
    Country
    Netherlands
    Politics
    Norway Deal-NEXIT, Dutch Realm Atlanticist, Habsburg Legitimist
    Religion
    Sedevacantist
    Relationship Status
    Engaged
    Age
    36
    Gender
    Posts
    70,127
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34,729
    Given: 61,129

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    It sure beat Operation Downfall.



    Wake up and smell the coffee.


  4. #4
    Out of the ***** Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Finnish Swede
    Country
    Sweden
    Age
    -
    Gender
    Posts
    11,434
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 13,023
    Given: 2,190

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Necessary to whom?

    1.) Americans? To test their new weapon (against civil people)? Probably yes.

    2.) To WWII? Nope, the main islands of Japan were already besieged plus Sovjets also attacked against Japan.
    Of course war ended now very quickly but the price was horrible/inhumane.

    I really hope that Americans were the first and the last nation (in humans history) which uses that kind of weapon against cities and civil people....

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    10-02-2021 @ 09:55 AM
    Country
    Jamaica
    Gender
    Posts
    4,723
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,667
    Given: 5,726

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    Unertunately I'd say yes because Japan would not have surrendered and casualities (ground invasion of Japan) would be even much greater. Just my opinion which isn't necessarily correct.
    While this is true, I think the number of casualties is quite irrelevant in the grander scheme of things. The most important factor to consider is that the bombs taught the world their destructive ability. If they never dropped the bombs, chances are someone would have done it at a later stage with even more (and possibly several) powerful bombs.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hiroshima était-il indispensable ?
    By PHDNM in forum France
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-06-2019, 03:53 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-26-2016, 07:44 PM
  3. 24 Hours After Hiroshima
    By The Lawspeaker in forum History
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-17-2012, 09:30 PM
  4. Ethics [Split from Hiroshima thread]
    By Debaser11 in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-07-2010, 01:27 AM
  5. Lest we forget: American atrocities in Hiroshima
    By Loki in forum War & Military
    Replies: 97
    Last Post: 08-22-2010, 05:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •