0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,030 Given: 10,292 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,030 Given: 10,292 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,030 Given: 10,292 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,282 Given: 1,180 |
It's a anglo-saxon term, i don't use it...
But :
if you put aside a part of Bretons who have the most "british-like" contribution (I say "a part", because it is a gradient: the more you go to the east of Brittany, the more people have an increasing "French-like" contribution) and perhaps some Normans from the coast (it is debatable, in terms of number), no... a French is not the same as an Irishman, an Englishman, etc.
Regarding the "Italians": in America, you have mainly "southern Italians" (especially Sicilians; "Italian" in USA means "Sicilian" especially, it's a synonym), people who have a "Anatolian neolithic", but a more "Neolithic Levant shifted" ( that is to say a type of population "'Anatolian of the Neolithic" which is closer to the Levantines of the Neolithic; it is a contribution which one finds among many Greeks, all the Ashkenazi, Sephardic and others), that is to say a contribution which is not the same as that obtained from Piedmontese, Basques, French, English, etc. They also have other contributions, including Iran farmer, "Kura-araxes" (kind of Caucasus-like), etc.
All this means that we can discuss the term "hybrid" and "interbreeding" for them.
For the rest, yeah they are pretty close (irish are very, very close to english).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,030 Given: 6,625 |
WASP is a term non-'WASP's in the US use for founding stock Americans, who were predominantly British/English and Protestant.
It isn't used outside the US.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks