0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,197 Given: 677 |
So called real academics tend to be biased against race and IQ because they fear the rise of racism. They are also disproportionately Jews who have their own phobias and paranoias of "Nazism" and "Nazis". Ironically the Nazis dismissed IQ tests just like Stalin did and just like modern left wing "academics" do.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 405 Given: 505 |
Of course there will always be some people with a degree in sociology and psychology that will try to claim race is in no way related to IQ, because in most academic circles claiming otherwise is not remotely accepted. All reputable scientists correlate IQ levels with the surrounding and not genetics, so that they will still get published. I am not surprised that the leftist media (controlled by the jews) spreads the IQ=environment theory, since this totally serves their multicultural propaganda to flood Europe with immigrants and wipe out the native populations. Real academics, who don't care about positions or career but about the truth first and foremost, have been proving that intelligence correlates with race for decades.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,246 Given: 1,444 |
It is funny if you study physics you become acutely aware of what science really is. Physics is the king of the sciences in that all other sciences must obey it's laws e.g. chemistry and biology etc.. the idea that psychology and psychiatry obey the laws of physics is nonsensical because they are pseudo-sciences.
IQ or psychometry falls under the wider discipline of psychology :
Psychology has become an increasingly powerful component of ideology, ruling ideas that endorse exploitation and sabotage struggles against oppression. This psychology circulates way beyond colleges and clinics, and different versions of psychology as ideology are to be found nearly everywhere in capitalist society.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,731 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,346 Given: 1,328 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 326 Given: 252 |
Whether or not IQ is pseudo-science is a debate for another time but something doesn't need to be 'science' to have utility per se. It's a system and method of measuring someone's ability in certain cognitive functions. Are these functions the ones we should be measuring when determining ones "intelligence"? I don't know, but it doesn't matter if correlation is found between IQ and other key metrics such as income amount or education level that's reason enough to take it seriously. Call it what you want, it's irrelevant.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,246 Given: 1,444 |
IQ tests used to show that unwanted immigrants, to America, in the past, such as Jews and Chinese had low IQs but now it is the opposite because IQ of s bullshit .
Geneticists, have produced very strong evidence that the biological differences between Europeans, Africans, Chinese and Native Americans is negiligible. IQ differences being based on genetics is not scientific.
Last edited by JamesBond007; 08-17-2020 at 06:54 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,246 Given: 1,444 |
I am living in the 21st century where infotech and biotech are radically transforming society. In the 21st century we use brain imaging and computer algorithms to assess human intelligence.
You use IQ tests and horse and buggies instead of cars because you must be Amish or something
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks