0
Honestly, I really can't believe what I am reading. You are saying the conclusions in these studies are FALSE because they are PC and that these studies have to be written through a PC lens to be published. If that ain't the most alternative fact spin on science I ever heard, I don't know what is.
In regard to the 'gap' between SSAs and everyone else... the data is not in your favor nor does it prove that SSAs are a different subspecies under homo sapiens. You're making a far reaching argument that nobody in the 'real' community agrees with. It's a fringe idea that does not hold water, except on TA and places alike where this bs is further propagated. Until you (or someone who believes what you believe) can prove your theory and publishes an accredited paper, you're wrong. Maybe that is something that you will understand.
Bookmarks