"White People Have No Culture"

[Epirus DNA]

Cover your face in shame

[Teutone]

Epirus pay attention to the road and ur uber passangers

[Epirus DNA]

Epirus pay attention to the road and ur uber passangers

Greeks fresh off the boat own and work in restaurants, they don't drive Uber. Get your stereotypes straight, mutt. At least insult me with something that is relevant.

[luc2112]

I support what is backed by science. If race-egalitarianism isn't backed by science I don't support it.
According to mainstream, politically correct "science" difference between races is only appearance and stuff beneath their skin -including their bones- are exactly the same. According to actual science they certainly don't have the same bone qualities. There goes the whole "We're all the same inside" theory.

We are not equal in behavior (which is really important) in this paper you find the differences between 3 "races". Table 5 is well exemplified:

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf...TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf

[JosephK]

Cover your face in shame

You know, I should probably just let this go because I suppose at this point you're just trolling; but I can't help but feel this needs to be clarified.

I did not, ever, say that those articles were in any way wrong. I said they describe precisely what I'm saying, except that they don't specifically address "the gap."

The genetic distance gap between SSAs and everyone else is in no way "my" "theory." It was first discussed by Rebecca Cann and her team when they analyzed mtDNA for the first time, back in 1988, and ever since then, it has always been verified, to the point where we know that it must be the case. No one--no anthropologist or evolutionary biologist could or would possibly question this. The only thing that has changed since 1988 is the timing: Cann et al said the gap may have been around 500,000 years but now many newer (probably biased) papers put it as low as 75,000 years. But my point is is that when it is discussed, in journals and in academia, it has to be "framed" in a certain way, and the result, unfortunately, is people like you.

I do not know what you are talking about-- all you have to do is search the internet, Google or Google Scholar or whatever, and you will see this. For fuck's sake, man, you can even scour the DNA analysis posts here on TA and put together the theory on your own.

[Epirus DNA]

But my point is is that when it is discussed, in journals and in academia, it has to be "framed" in a certain way

This is what people like you say to defend their position. It is a total alternative spin on reality so that you may justify your narrative and world view.

[JosephK]

This is what people like you say to defend their position. It is a total alternative spin on reality so that you may justify your narrative and world view.

Are you serious? It is in the POLICIES of every American journal and scientific institute to do this. They will not publish an article that they feel might be considered divisive. PERIOD. How dare you have an opinion on something you know absolutely nothing about? You can look into this, you have the freedom to find this out for yourself.

[JosephK]

This is what people like you say to defend their position. It is a total alternative spin on reality so that you may justify your narrative and world view.

Why would you give me a thumbs-down, I'm trying to help you here. I have a feeling you're a BLMer.

[Epirus DNA]

Are you serious? It is in the POLICIES of every American journal and scientific institute to do this. They will not publish an article that they feel might be considered divisive. PERIOD. How dare you have an opinion on something you know absolutely nothing about? You can look into this, you have the freedom to find this out for yourself.

Are you serious right now? It has nothing do with "divisive" and it has everything to do with Facts and Science.

If an article is backed up by facts and science, it will get published. You know how many publishers are in the USA?

If an article is not backed up by facts and science, it can still get published, but not by an accredited American journal or scientific institute.

I'm sorry you live in an alternate universe, where your ideas are not backed up by facts and science. Like I said before, publish something. Prove you are correct. Until you or someone like you does, you are still wrong.

These are the Facts.

Facts are stubborn things.

[Epirus DNA]

Why would you give me a thumbs-down, I'm trying to help you here. I have a feeling you're a BLMer.

BLMer ? This is how I can tell you are a hack.