Do you consider yourself white?

[Hektor12]

In a broad sense, yes. In multiracial places people called me white to the date, and with skin type II another race option would be funny for me. I have two motives for this. Firstly, Turks were accepted to Australia under strict "white Australia" law* and secondly from genetical and antropological perspectives my race is "Predominantly Europoid" or "Europo-Mongoloid" so closer to europeans than any other racial group in the world.

I've heard some stories about some Turks called as poc in the west, but due to my physical traits i've never been in such situation. In an extreme "white" country like Norway, people asked me about being Polish, Russian, etc...

* see wikipedia: On 5 October 1967, the governments of Australia and Turkey signed an agreement to allow Turkish citizens to immigrate to Australia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Australians

[TheGoldenSon]

That's because they didn't have contacts with non Whites before, you silly.

I am sorry? What? Have you ever held a history book in your entire life. The whole shtick with Europe is that has been invaded and has invaded regions populated by other races than European ones. There was a thing called fucking Roman Republic and later the Empire. And trough it's 1000 year of history it brought into contact Germans with Persian, Kushites with Gauls, Semites with Britons... In the entire 1000 years of the Roman state which served as trans-Mediterranean cultural and racial pollination crossroad, there has never been a recorded instance of "whiteness". Could you tell me why? Why wasn't there a "united white front" when Europeans were exposed to non-Europeans?

For God sake man Altayic people have been migrating/invading the continent for millennia, the Huns, the Bulgars, the Pechengs, the Tartars, the Magyars, the Oghuz, none of them were racially cleansed by some "great white coalition", but they were assimilated, literally fucked out of existence trough sheer scales of our population differences. Even the most Turkic looking Turks of Anatolia looks more like the ancient Romans of Asia Minor than the Seljuk horsemen which claimed Persia and Mesopotamia for their Empire.

[Übermensch]

NO, i don't consider myself white in the slightest.

[ModernMaskil]

Do you deny your people are disproportionality involved in demonizing and deconstructing White identity?

muh white identity!!!!!!! it's gone poof.

[Universe]

Do you deny your people are disproportionality involved in demonizing and deconstructing White identity?

Are they?

[Supercomputer]

I am sorry? What? Have you ever held a history book in your entire life. The whole shtick with Europe is that has been invaded and has invaded regions populated by other races than European ones. There was a thing called fucking Roman Republic and later the Empire. And trough it's 1000 year of history it brought into contact Germans with Persian, Kushites with Gauls, Semites with Britons... In the entire 1000 years of the Roman state which served as trans-Mediterranean cultural and racial pollination crossroad, there has never been a recorded instance of "whiteness". Could you tell me why? Why wasn't there a "united white front" when Europeans were exposed to non-Europeans?

For God sake man Altayic people have been migrating/invading the continent for millennia, the Huns, the Bulgars, the Pechengs, the Tartars, the Magyars, the Oghuz, none of them were racially cleansed by some "great white coalition", but they were assimilated, literally fucked out of existence trough sheer scales of our population differences. Even the most Turkic looking Turks of Anatolia looks more like the ancient Romans of Asia Minor than the Seljuk horsemen which claimed Persia and Mesopotamia for their Empire.

I was talking about in comparison to the modern globalised world. The average person of Europe didn't have hardly any contact with non Whites for most of history unlike today with modern travel and migration. Hell, most rural people of Europe didn't even know that Black people existed until relatively recently. Races that conquered Europe were relatively light in pigmentation and not very different from Europeans. It is in contact with Blacks (and other dark races like Indians) that the term white arose, and this contact would have happened eventually even if there was no slavery and colonialism. The world would still have become globalised eventually. And even you agree that Europeans identity would still be there. What I'm saying is that you cannot have multiracial society without Whiteness. The only places where there isn't' any whiteness are monoracial White countries. Places like Estonia or Iceland. And even those places will be subjected to immigration and Whiteness will eventually become a thing.

[Übermensch]

This is my skin, it is brown, therefore i'm not white but brown.

[Supercomputer]

muh white identity!!!!!!! it's gone poof.

What about your Jewish identity? It's based on nothing more than stupid religious beliefs. At least White identity is (beside other things) based on physical appearance which is human nature. White identity is more justified and legitimate than Jewish identify. Jewish identity is also more oppressive than White identity.

[Supercomputer]

Are they?

Yes they are. The intellectual father of anti White ideas was Jewish professor Joel Igneatev for example.

Edit: and the only Jewish person talking on this thread is also anti-White. What a coincidence. Or should I say Cohencidence.

[Universe]

Yes they are. The intellectual father of anti White ideas was Jewish professor Joel Igneatev for example.

That's an anecdotal evidence, if any. Tons of non-jewish White people have 'anti white ideas'. Most people who have these ideas aren't jewsh.