Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Y-chromosome genetic analysis of modern Polish population

  1. #1
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    me
    Country
    European Union
    Y-DNA
    R1a > YP1337 > R-BY160486*
    mtDNA
    H3*
    Gender
    Posts
    6,066
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,240
    Given: 2,623

    6 Not allowed!

    Default Y-chromosome genetic analysis of modern Polish population

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles...67309/abstract

    full version but with editions https://sci-hub.ren/10.3389/fgene.2020.567309

    Intra-population variability of Y chromosome

    Our findings display slight differences from previous studies20with regard to main haplogroup distribution, haplogroup frequencyand the occurrence of rare haplogroups. In the 388present study, as expected, the most common haplogroup (hg) was found to be R, with a frequency of 71.02%; this is slightly higher than the 68.6% reported by Kayser et al., (2005).

    Regarding its subhaplogroups, the highest frequency was observed for R1a(56.93%) followed by R1b(14.08%);
    similarly, Kayser et al., (2005) found haplogroup R1a1* to be the most prevalent (57%). The interpolation maps indicate that R1a is distributed mostly in the center part of Poland 3ith a few regions on the west and east of the country. Interestingly, R1a was also foundto be 5presentin high numbers in eastern regions, including the Podlaskie and Warmian-Mazurian voivodeships, as well as almost all of the Lublin voivodeship; similar results were also obtained from central regions and Western Pomerania, which may have some historical basis.

    In contrast, R1b was more widely distributed, reaching further east and west than the others; however, it is observed at relatively low frequencies in regions adjacent to the western and eastern borders of Poland. Such a pattern of distribution of hgR in the Polish population can reflect some historical events such as massive human migrations or the changes in the territorialborders.


    A similar situation was observed in the case of hg I, whose distribution also followed geographic lines and possibly,historical events. Haplogroup I1 is found to be represented mostly in western Poland with only one region behind the Vistula river with a frequency higher than 9.68%: cluster number 38 (the border of Lublin and Mazovia voivodeships).
    Haplogroup I2 appears in eastern Poland,mostly in the Podlaskie and Lublin voivodeships, but also reaches the eastern parts of Mazovia, the western parts of Warmian-Mazurian and almost all of Subcarpathia, which makes these regions similar to the west in terms of haplogroup frequency. Kayser et al. (2005) also note that hgI was ranked just behind hg R with regard to prevalence; however its prevalence was found to be 17.30% compared to 15.49% observed in the current study.

    Kayser et al. (2005) also report similar frequencies for the subsequent haplogroups, N (3.7% 414vs. 4.29%)and E (4.5% vs. 3.84%),with a slight difference in the place of haplogroup in the total pattern. Interestingly, in the case of hg N, the Podlaskie voivodeship is distinct from the remaining voivodeships: the frequency of hg N, which is common among Finns and other inhabitants of north-eastEurope, is 14.55% in this area and brings Podlaskie closer to the northern regions in this regard.

    In contrast, hg E displays much greater homogeneity across the map, with fewer marked differences between regions.

    Regarding the occurrence and frequency of rare haplogroups, i.e. those with a frequency less than 1%, hgs Q, C, T, Hand Owere identified in the current study, while K, DE and P were reported by Kayser et al. (2005). The greatest difference between the two sets of results concerns hgF, its prevalence being 2.0%in the previous study but absent from the present results. 425The observed differences between the studiescan be accounted for by differences in sample population number and profile. The present study was based on a data set comprising 2705 individuals from all 16 voivodeships and 337 out of the 380 counties, while Kayser et al. 428(2005) was probably based on inhabitants of the main cities in Poland (Wrocław, Warsaw, Lublin, Kraków, Bydgoszcz, Gdańsk, Szczecin and Suwałki). Unfortunately, due to a lack of such studies, it is not possible to perform a detailed comparison of haplogroup frequencies for all voivodeshipsand counties.








    Clusters on PCA
    Last edited by Lucas; 08-29-2020 at 11:43 AM.
    K36 Ancestral Report and Chromosomal Analysis / G25 Maps
    https://www.lm-genetics.com

  2. #2
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 07:29 AM
    Location
    Pole position
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    21,469
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20,922
    Given: 18,998

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Interesting.

    IMO they should divide the samples by voivodeship based on birthplaces of most distant direct paternal ancestors, not place of residence,

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    me
    Country
    European Union
    Y-DNA
    R1a > YP1337 > R-BY160486*
    mtDNA
    H3*
    Gender
    Posts
    6,066
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,240
    Given: 2,623

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Holy Cross ( Świętokrzyskie) has lowest number of samples so probably quite high N here is due to randomness.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kaspias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Ankara
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Rumelian
    Ethnicity
    Balkan Turkish, Pomak
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    Q-F16045
    mtDNA
    K1a
    Gender
    Posts
    7,445
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11,835
    Given: 7,303

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucas View Post
    Holy Cross ( Świętokrzyskie) has lowest number of samples so probably quite high N here is due to randomness.
    Which clade of Q present there?
    qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
    Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
    MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    me
    Country
    European Union
    Y-DNA
    R1a > YP1337 > R-BY160486*
    mtDNA
    H3*
    Gender
    Posts
    6,066
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,240
    Given: 2,623

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaspias View Post
    Which clade of Q present there?
    I hope in suplemental (which is not provided yet) they will show some subclades... This voivodship has also too high number of N for central Poland. I guess it is due to low number of samples comparing to other voivodships. If not I have no idea.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Last Online
    03-23-2023 @ 10:39 AM
    Ethnicity
    Healthy human being
    Country
    Moldova
    Gender
    Posts
    5,581
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,505
    Given: 1,507

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Can't help but notice the elevated E and J in the Carpathian region.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    me
    Country
    European Union
    Y-DNA
    R1a > YP1337 > R-BY160486*
    mtDNA
    H3*
    Gender
    Posts
    6,066
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,240
    Given: 2,623

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ion Basescul View Post
    Can't help but notice the elevated E and J in the Carpathian region.
    Those in former German northern and western Poland (except Opole) are probably emigrants from SE Poland too.




    Cluster 30 is partly Ukrainian admixed even (of course resettled there after 1945).
    {Ukrainians_in_Poland_2002}
    Last edited by Lucas; 08-29-2020 at 11:41 AM.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 07:29 AM
    Location
    Pole position
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    21,469
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20,922
    Given: 18,998

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Maps of I1 and I2 are interesting. Gdansk (36) has less than 4,1% of I1. They did not sample Kashubia (west of Gdansk) where there is 13% of I1:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kashubians#Genetics

    Elevated I1 in place (14) must be the result of Kashub migration westward. In place (27) it is the result of westward migration from Wielkopolska.

  9. #9
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 07:29 AM
    Location
    Pole position
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    21,469
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20,922
    Given: 18,998

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Map of I2 shows where admixture from Polonized in Late Medieval times East Slavs is high - (12), (33), (25) and (18).

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    me
    Country
    European Union
    Y-DNA
    R1a > YP1337 > R-BY160486*
    mtDNA
    H3*
    Gender
    Posts
    6,066
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,240
    Given: 2,623

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peterski View Post
    Map of I2 shows where admixture from Polonized in Late Medieval times East Slavs is high - (12), (33), (25) and (18).
    If western Ukrainians should be counted as East Slavs which autosomally is debatable.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. LM Genetics Chromosome Analysis
    By 95K1ller in forum Autosomal DNA
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-10-2019, 04:25 AM
  2. Help For K36 Chromosome Analysis
    By karakartal in forum Autosomal DNA
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-06-2019, 11:55 AM
  3. Firemonkey's chromosome analysis
    By firemonkey in forum Autosomal DNA
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-14-2019, 07:09 AM
  4. karakartal LM Genetics Chromosome Analysis
    By karakartal in forum Autosomal DNA
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-01-2019, 03:30 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •