Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Q-L330 and Huns

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Last Online
    10-07-2022 @ 11:15 PM
    Ethnicity
    Mongol
    Country
    Mongolia
    Gender
    Posts
    113
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 86
    Given: 0

    3 Not allowed!

    Default Q-L330 and Huns

    Two separate groups of the same name, Huns and Xiongnu troubled Europe and China during 450 CE and 400 BCE respectively, creating the Hunnic empire and the Xiongnu empire. Today, the common presence of Q-L330 in west Altai and west Alps gives us the opportunity to unify these early Hunnic raiders.
    Q-L330 was found with a percentage of 25% in Altaians and 38% in Tuvans in the western part of the Mongolian mountain chain, while it is a unique y-dna lineage found with 84% among the Kets, a neighbouring Yeniseian-speaking population.

    The Xiongnu had created a vast empire during 200 BCE comprising modern Mongolia, Xinjiang and the Altai mountains, having a complex system of hierarchy with many dynasties and a lot of manpower and subjects, including the Q-M25 iron-mining Turks of Altai who at that time provided weapons for the Xiongnu army.
    Seven thousand miles westernwards in the slopes of the Alps, Q-L330 is found about 5% close in the area where Attila drove European Huns in the battle of the Catalaunian plains. The Huns in Europe had a created a vast empire with control center in Hungary, collecting subjects from Ukraine and taxes from Rome, making many raids in western Germany that caused the Germanic migrations.
    A third group were the White Huns or Epthalites who created a nomadic empire in Central Asia at 450 as well. These might have cut off earlier before the invasion of the main group of Huns in Europe. Their state was dissolved by an alliance of Turks and Persians.

    Q-L330 in Mongolia was probably reduced a lot with the defeat of the Xiongnu by the C Xianbei Turks and proto-Mongols, who ruled Mongolia afterwards.
    It seems to have been further restricted by the expansion of y-dna N reindeer herders in Siberia leading to the isolation of Kets and neighbouring Yeniseian-speaking communities in the basin of the Yeniseian river.
    A lot of Q-L330 has been absorbed within the Altaic Turkic-speaking communities in western Mongolia, where it is actually the common type of Q.

    Modern Mongolians also retain the memory of being the descendants of Huns. Hün gürnii suu ih hüch doroitoj, eh nutgaa sangalzan iinhüü guniglan duulav.

    It is also very interesting to notice that all native American mtdna lineages X, A, B, C, D were found in samples from the Xiongnu period in Mongolia, along other various types of Q*, rendering Huns of that era a miniature of the native American genome.

    Q-L330 has a lot of first-step mutations, indicative of its origin being also in the broader Mongolian region.
    Q-L330 has two main subclades, Q-L332 and Q-B287.
    The first, Q-L332 is found in Hungary, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, making it possibly the haplogroup of European Huns and White Huns in Central Asia.
    The second, Q-B287 is the type of Q-L330 usually found in Yeniseian people, making the most probable haplogroup of the Xiongnu as well.

    The Szekelys, a Hungarian-speaking group of Transylvania, also claim to be the desendants of Huns. Most though belong to Q-L715, the Oghuric branch of Q-M25, making the majority probably of Turkic origin, rather than Hunnic. There is also Q-L332 but it is lower.
    The name Hungary also is derived from Onogurs, a Turkic-speaking tribe of the Oghur branch.

    There was also an attempt to connect Yeniseian languages with Na-Dene languages, but I consider it will be fruitless from a genetic point of view, at least patrilineally. I think Turkic to Inuit or Na-Dene would yield better results, if at all. Nevertheless, the ancestral types of the Ket group seem to have been y-dna Q and mtdna A, with other types being more recent.

    KetsY_DNA.gifSelkupsY_DNA.gifQ-L332IMG-20200808-001136.jpg
    Q.pngEurope-c-1227-AD-2k.jpgYeniseian_map_XVII-XX.png496px-Yeniseian_languages_map.svg.pngHsiung-nu-Empire.pngunnamed.gifpalaeo-siberian-haplogroup-y-dna.jpgLocation-and-brief-tree_Q640.jpg12915_2018_622_Fig3_HTML.jpgHuns450.pngmap.GIFAsia_001ad.jpgSzékelys


    1. Paternal origin of Paleo-Indians in Siberia: insights from Y-chromosome sequences

    2. Genetic Perspective on Language Replacement in Siberia
    Q-L330_tree

    3. Ancient links between Siberians and Native Americans revealed by subtyping the Y chromosome haplogroup Q1a

    4. Analysis of the human Y-chromosome haplogroup Q characterizes ancient population movements in Eurasia and the Americas

    5. Afghan Hindu Kush: Where Eurasian Sub-Continent Gene Flows Converge

    6. The First Peopling of South America: New Evidence from Y-Chromosome Haplogroup Q

    7. Genomic study of the Ket: a Paleo-Eskimo-related ethnic group with significant ancient North Eurasian ancestry

    8. High Levels of Y-Chromosome Differentiation among Native Siberian Populations and the Genetic Signature of a Boreal Hunter-Gatherer Way of Life

    9. Y Chromosome Sequences Reveal a Short Beringian Standstill, Rapid Expansion, and early Population structure of Native American Founders

    10. A Siberian Link With Na-Dene Languages
    Last edited by Shubotai; 08-29-2020 at 12:00 PM.

  2. #2
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kaspias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Ankara
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Rumelian
    Ethnicity
    Balkan Turkish, Pomak
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    Q-F16045
    mtDNA
    K1a
    Gender
    Posts
    7,446
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11,836
    Given: 7,303

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Q-L332 among Hungarians roots to Jasz region, which indicates the need for the research more on Jasz community and the people they migrated with. On the other hand, Q-M25 being a clear Turkic marker is present in Bukovina and Transylvania with a TMRCA 1700 ybp. Makes stakes rise to be of Hunnic origin rather than Cuman. This is something expected from my perspective because formerly Yeniseian speakers probably already absorbed among Turks before the migration to the West which caused such amount of mass migration. Confederate form of nation replaced with Turkic domination and opened the way of formation of Turkic Khanate.



    Evaluation of two different Hungarian project merged:




    For L330, I recently prepared a PCA with all known(open to public) samples to see who is close to what.






    , the common presence of Q-L330 in west Altai and west Alps gives us the opportunity to unify these early Hunnic raiders.
    May I ask the source for the Alpine part?

    The first, Q-L332 is found in Hungary, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, making it possibly the haplogroup of European Huns and White Huns in Central Asia.
    May I ask the source for presence among Uzbek and Kazakh?

    I did not know these two, so it would be interesting to read the articles.
    qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
    Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
    MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Last Online
    10-07-2022 @ 11:15 PM
    Ethnicity
    Mongol
    Country
    Mongolia
    Gender
    Posts
    113
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 86
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Sure, for Q-L330 it lists so in ISOGG Q for both France and Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, with some of the sources also. It is actually 2.1% for Switzerland and 5.1% in Lyon France. For the Alpine part also there is Dispersals of the Siberian Y-chromosome haplogroup Q in Eurasia that listed Q-F1161 as the main type of Q there, which is outside even Q-L53, or Q-L804 which is inside Q-L53, but those last two are like native European. And there are commercial samples with Q-L275 from Switzerland so it may be pretty mixed.

    In order to understand the relative position of Q-L330 within Q, I will add here a general part of the Q tree from ISOGG:
    Q1b1a1-M930>M3,L804
    Q1b1a2-Z780
    Q1b1a3-Q-L330

    So the first one is Q-M930 which includes Q-M3 and L804 which are the Native American and Scandinavian lineages respectively. The second one is Q-Z780 which is also a Native American lineage but is also found in Siberia. And the third one is Q-L330 which is found mostly in Altai in Mongolia, central Siberia in Russia and smaller numbers in Central Asia and Europe.

    For Q-L330 specifically, I should mention:

    Mitochondrial DNA and Y Chromosome Variation Provides Evidence for a Recent Common Ancestry between Native Americans and Indigenous Altaians
    A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture
    Genomic study of the Ket: a Paleo-Eskimo-related ethnic group with significant ancient North Eurasian ancestry

    High Levels of Y-Chromosome Differentiation among Native Siberian Populations and the Genetic Signature of a Boreal Hunter-Gatherer Way of Life
    Paternal origin of Paleo-Indians in Siberia: insights from Y-chromosome sequences
    The First Peopling of South America: New Evidence from Y-Chromosome Haplogroup Q

  4. #4
    Bender1999
    Guest

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Very interesting!

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Last Online
    10-07-2022 @ 11:15 PM
    Ethnicity
    Mongol
    Country
    Mongolia
    Gender
    Posts
    113
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 86
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Siberian linguistic groups
    kart_index03.jpg

    Frequencies for Yeniseian and Turkic-speaking altaic groups

    Kets 94% Q-L330>B287
    Selkups 66% Q-L330>B287, Uralic-speaking so probably assimilated Yeniseians

    Chelkans 60% Q-M346 no tested subclade but probably Q-L330
    Todjins 38.5% Q-M346
    Tuvans 38% Q-M346
    Tubalars 37% Q-M346
    Soyots 7% Q-M346
    Khakass 6% Q-M346
    Chulyms 65% Q-M25 but of recent Tatar origin
    Tofalars 43% N2, 27% N3a
    Khakass 34% N2
    Tuvans 24% N2

    Prevalence of mtdna C in all Altaic groups except Mongolic group Soyots and Mongolian-influenced Tuvans where mtdna D is more frequent.
    In Shors and Khakas ydna N and mtdna F are more common.

    R1a also very common in all altaic groups, subclade Z93.
    North Altaians 24% R1a
    South Altaians 53% R1a

    In Mongolians also, Q-L330 1-3% while Q-M25 0.5%.

    AltaiansSouthernY_DNA.gif
    ShorsY_DNA.gif
    SoyotsY_DNA.gif
    TodjinsY_DNA.gif
    TuvansY_DNA.gif
    TofalarsY_DNA.gif
    ShoriansMT_DNA.png
    TuviniansN=458MT_DNA.gif
    TuviniansN=36MT_DNA.gif
    SoyotsMT_DNA.gif
    TodjinsMT_DNA.gif
    AltaiansNorthernY_DNA.gif
    Altai-kiji_MT_DNA.gif
    AltaiansMT_DNA.gif
    Last edited by Shubotai; 09-12-2020 at 02:24 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Huns vs Vikings
    By BarbarTurk in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 05-15-2022, 03:37 AM
  2. A closer look to Huns
    By Kaspias in forum Genetics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-27-2020, 03:53 PM
  3. Classify huns
    By Blondie in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 03-05-2019, 12:58 PM
  4. Who was Attila and the Huns?
    By RussiaPrussia in forum History
    Replies: 525
    Last Post: 02-19-2019, 11:34 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-06-2018, 07:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •