Viminacium YDNA leaked

[Jana]

From upcoming Reich lab paper.

All samples were 1240K sequenced at Reich Lab, so they are SNP confirmed.

Viminacium - 28 (labeled Serbia_Roman):

E x 13 (L618 x 6; L618>V13 x 3; Z830 x 1; Z830>M123 x 1; Z1902 x 1; M96 x 1)

G x 5 (PF3148 x 1; PF3148>L91 x 1; P303 x 1; L497 x 1; L497>Z1815 x 1)

R1b x 3 (Z2103 x 1; U106 x 1; U152>L2>Z367 x 1)

R1a x 2 (Z2124>Z2122 x 1; Z2124>Z2123 x 1)

J x 2 (M304 x 1; L24 x 1)

T x 1 (M184)

I1 x 1 (M253)

I2 x 1 (L596)


Timacum Minus, Slog necropolis - 10 (labeled Serbia_Roman):

E x 3 (M35 x 1; L618 x 1; L618>V13 x 1)

J x 3 (M304 x 1; M410 x 1; M241 x 1)

R1b x 2 (Z2103 x 1; Z2103>CTS1450 x 1)

G x 1 (CTS342>FGC12126)

I1 x 1 (Z58>CTS8647)


Timacum Minus, Kuline necropolis - 5 (labeled Serbia_Early_Middle_Age):

I2 x 2 (M423 x 2)

E x 1 (L618)

J x 1 (M304)

R1b x 1 (P312>DF99)


Lepenski Vir - 2:

E x 1 (M35) - Serbia_Roman

J x 1 (M102) - Serbia_Medieval


Mediana - 2 (labeled Serbia_Gepid):

G x 1 (P287)

I1 x 1 (Z58>CTS8647)


Gomolava - 1 (labeled Serbia_Medieval):

I2 x 1 (M423>L621>CTS4002)

[CommonSense]

Can't wait to see what conspiracy theories the growing community of fans of pseudo-history in Serbia will concoct to explain this!

[gixajo]

And comparing this with nowadays people of that area are they many diffrences?

Edit:I don´t see many R1a, but, if it was a Roman settlement, could have a logic explanation.

Re-edit:strange clades for r1a...Z2124>Z2122 x 1; Z2124>Z2123

[Jana]

And comparing this with nowadays people of that area are they many diffrences?

Edit:I don´t see many R1a, but, if it was a Roman settlement, could have a logic explanation.

Re-edit:strange clades for r1a...Z2124>Z2122 x 1; Z2124>Z2123

Big difference. No presence of Slavic I2a and R1a clades whatsoever, not even among medieval samples (which are few in number though)

[Dr_Maul]

A lot of J2.

[Peterski]

And comparing this with nowadays people of that area are they many diffrences?

No any I2a-Din and no R1a (except for "Asian" / Indo-Iranian Z2124) in Roman era samples (n=39).

not even among medieval samples

Early Medieval samples either predate the arrival of Slavs, or Slavs burned their dead at that time.

[Jana]

Interesting is presumably Germanic I1-Z58 among Romans and Gepids (1 each)

https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-CTS8647/

[Peterski]

Interesting is Germanic I1-Z58 among Romans and Gepids (1 each)

https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-CTS8647/

It says: formed 4100 ybp, TMRCA 4100 ybp - so much older than the foundation of Rome (ca. 2800 ybp).

[Peterski]

Re-edit:strange clades for r1a...Z2124>Z2122 x 1; Z2124>Z2123

Scythian / Indo-Iranian / Turkic, today more common in Asia than in Europe.

[ixulescu]

No any I2a-Din and no R1a (except for "Asian" / Indo-Iranian Z2124) in Roman era samples (n=39).



Early Medieval samples either predate the arrival of Slavs, or Slavs burned their dead at that time.

Why would they be found in Roman samples? it makes no sense. It's the Illyrian and Thracian samples that are relevant for this question.