Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Which 3 ethnolinguistic groups do you wish were still around?

  1. #21
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    05-24-2021 @ 05:51 PM
    Location
    Ionian islands and Thessaly
    Ethnicity
    Greek
    Country
    Greece
    Politics
    Neo-liberal
    Hero
    Sikeliot
    Gender
    Posts
    9,492
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,258
    Given: 3,510

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    *Gauls
    *Megalithic-Aquitani (ok we still have basque but geographically very limited)
    *thracians

  2. #22
    Super Moderator KrashNick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Skipetar
    Country
    Kosovo
    Region
    Dardania
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    Gender
    Posts
    2,737
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,778
    Given: 1,359

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Illyrians
    Thracians
    Macedonians

  3. #23
    Bender1999
    Guest

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mingle View Post
    That's complete nonsense, dude. Khwarezmians were Iranic. Please stop claiming everything as Turkic. This is the first time I've heard them being called Turks. What's next, Sogdians were a Turkic dynasty?
    Speak like a men with me. I am the last person in who denies the existence of Iranics in Central Asia, there were a Turkic dynasty with this name there. So i didnt deny that there were an east Iranic language which was spoken there which also called so, but actually Khwarezmians are well known Turkic dynasty too. If you never heard of them its not my fault...

  4. #24
    Hatchling
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Mingle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    America
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Iranic
    Ethnicity
    Pashtun
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Aboriginal
    Y-DNA
    R1a>Z93>FT296004
    mtDNA
    U2c1
    Gender
    Posts
    10,529
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,913
    Given: 7,434

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bender1999 View Post
    Speak like a men with me. I am the last person in who denies the existence of Iranics in Central Asia, there were a Turkic dynasty with this name there. So i didnt deny that there were an east Iranic language which was spoken there which also called so, but actually Khwarezmians are well known Turkic dynasty too. If you never heard of them its not my fault...
    Kyp asked about the existence of a Khwarezmian people (not polity). And your immediate response was mentioning a Turkic dynasty in the region. This gave me the implication you considered the Khwarezmian people to be Turks. So if I misunderstood you, you should have been clearer. I probably shouldn't the tone, but I've seen lots of people on TA claiming too many things as Turkic, so that has grown to become my reaction.
    Last edited by Mingle; 09-17-2020 at 11:05 PM.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Last Online
    09-23-2020 @ 08:07 PM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    San Marino
    Gender
    Posts
    13
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 1

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KrashNick View Post
    Illyrians
    Thracians
    Macedonians
    +1

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Last Online
    09-23-2020 @ 08:07 PM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    San Marino
    Gender
    Posts
    13
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 1

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Most powerful Illyrian tribes were actually the Dardanians, Autariate and the Ardiaei. They held large parts of Illyria under their rule and they also expanded into Macedonian and Epirotan lands such as the Dardanians. Both the Ardiaei and Dardanians held lands as South as Southern Albania.

    All Illyrians that had access to the sea were building ships.

    If we look at Strabo's geography he describes the Illyrian lands from Croatia to Southern Albania and even distinguishes them from their neighbors. So the term Illyrian must of meant a similar group of people in costumes, language and various other things, how else would someone be able to make such a distinction. Also they mingled with each other. Of course, there might of been regional differences.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ancient Ethnolinguistic Iberian G25 calculator
    By Raizen in forum Autosomal DNA
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 03-09-2024, 02:51 PM
  2. Guess 10 groups!
    By chipriota in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-28-2012, 06:06 AM
  3. 5 groups!
    By chipriota in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-11-2012, 08:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •