1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,075 Given: 1,717 |
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.oldschool anthropologydivided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpine
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,044 Given: 6,628 |
But that would contradict the paper in saying that it was Norwegians who had the most influence in Ireland, 16% Danish vs 4% Norwegian in Ireland seems a bit lopsided.
That's still over 20% Germanic for Ireland nonetheless, which is more than would be predicted with Y-DNA estimates.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,588 Given: 29,041 |
Well there is no West Norwegian Vikings in this paper so it will be interesting when some of these are released. What this paper says is that the Danish Vikings had a higher Swedish content so they reached their conclusion about England on this. The Danish in England is obviously lacking some of this Swedish component. I'm just going by what the study says as these admixture results are based on the Viking genomes but I just thought that was an interesting point about the Swedish component.
Anyway there should be more Anglo-Saxons soon and also there is another Viking study that will have West Norwegians so it should get more clearer with more of these ancient samples.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,402 Given: 2,646 |
Is everything you thought about Vikings and the Viking Age wrong???
Here are some of my comments in the new Viking DNA paper which I am a co-author of, which was published: 16 September 2020 in Nature and titled: Population genomics of the Viking world. Is everything you thought about Vikings and the Viking Age wrong??? Well no, so this video is here to relax everyone who got taken on the bed, as the expression goes in Norway. All in all, quite a lot of people with heritage from Northern Europe seem to have Viking in us to some extent since the study confirms that Vikings travelled, settled and mixed in many places around the World.As one professor has pointed out in a comment to the study, it reinforces almost all of what we know about the Viking age. Though as a headline by one journalist who tried to say that the Viking's "reality was decidedly diverse" is just too plain and also contradictory. For my part, this exciting study has provided us with many new questions and we are now working on larger projects to follow up these.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,588 Given: 29,041 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,588 Given: 29,041 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,044 Given: 6,628 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,588 Given: 29,041 |
I guess also historically the Irish did differentiate between the Danes and Norwegians i.e. the Dubgaill and Finngaill. They do say though that it was mostly Norse that concentrated on Ireland and Scotland and it seems that is was Norse that the genomes from Ireland were although I would like to see more to clarify this.
I honestly change my mind all the time with these studies. It does look like there are a lot more coming so I'm sure in a few years we will hopefully have a much better understanding of the population history of Europe and I'm especially interested in Ireland and Britain.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,044 Given: 6,628 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,076 Given: 6,670 |
I heard vikings actually mostly had brown/black hair as opposed to blonde. Sounds promising given that the sexual selection of fair haired women may have changed that for modern day scandanavia.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks