Europeans are genetically anti-Semitic, Jewish man says

[EternalYouth]

I look exactly like the one at the front

You look like YHWH Himself? Can't look better than the Man Upstairs Himself

[Insuperable]

- And Donald Trump is actually the most pro-Israel leader that has existed for the last two thousand years.

- Yes, I think it is very good that it is not Europeans who are involved, he continues.

In other words he is saying that once you are breast fed in America the composition of milk changes.

[Tong]

You look like YHWH Himself? Can't look better than the Man Upstairs Himself

Det e bra.

[alnortedelsur]

We could also say that Jews are genetically Anti-European.

[Crn Volk]

We could also say that Jews are genetically Anti-European.

They are anti everyone and only pro Jew. The ultimate preservationists.

[Latinus]

We could also say that Jews are genetically Anti-European.

Some are, but I doubt the average Jew wakes up thinking: "another day starts, another day to promote the genocide of the white race (insert evil laugh)."

[alnortedelsur]

Some are, but I doubt the average Jew wakes up thinking: "another day starts, another day to promote the genocide of the white race (insert evil laugh)."

Of course not all of them, but anti-European Jews like that fucking Rabino should get their fuck out of Western European/mostly Euro descent countries if they think Europeans and their descendants are anti Jew by genetics, and if they dislike Europeans so much, instead of conspiring against them with all their shitty multiculturalist/pro LGBT/pro immigration agenda.

[JamesBond007]

Some are, but I doubt the average Jew wakes up thinking: "another day starts, another day to promote the genocide of the white race (insert evil laugh)."

It doesn't matter whether the Jewish hoi polloi know what they are doing or if only their leaders know that their policies are bad for the West because the end result is the same regardless.

The real Jewish Question may be explained as follows: If there is so much emerging from the Jewish Quarter which is threatening to Western culture and to the white race which founded that culture, then how can the West allow itself the luxury of retaining the Jews in its midst? This is not, of course, to say that all Jews are bad, or even most of them; it is rather to say that -- to use an unfortunate but apt analogy -- if a swamp keeps breeding malaria, then no matter how many innocent beings the swamp may contain, are we not justified in draining it? There is, of course, no denying that Jews have made great contributions to the West, and no denying that their contributions are significantly out of proportion to their numbers, as is their intelligence. But there is also no denying that Jewish good must be balanced against Jewish evil, and that if Jewish evil is so profound as to be threatening the demise of Western civilization, then the amount of Jewish good -- however great it might be -- may not really matter. But in speaking of Jewish good and Jewish evil, we seem to be engaging in the morally dubious act of judging Jews as collectively responsible for this good or evil, rather than judging them on their individual behavior. But while it is all very well to aspire to judge people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin -- or in the case of Jews, by their ethnicity -- it is another thing entirely to be able to "know" the content of an individual's character. Thus while skin color, ethnic origin, or other group designator is a highly imperfect vehicle for judging character, it nevertheless gives some information, and thus makes possible a probability judgment. Accordingly, if we cannot determine the individual's character, we would be as foolish to refuse to make a probability judgment based on ethnicity as we would be to refuse to ignore the likelihood that a visitor to a casino is going to leave with his wallet lightened, or that playing Russian roulette is likely to get you killed. Thus in spite of a moral preference for judging the individual rather than the collective, the fact remains that, to some degree or another, Jews will be held collectively responsible for the acts of Jewish individuals. The matter does not rest purely on probability considerations, however, but on the fact of what philosophers call emergent properties, i.e., the fact that the group may exhibit properties which are not manifest in individuals. The classic example of emergent properties is salt, which is composed of sodium and chlorine: While both of these substances are poisonous separately, their combination as sodium chloride is essential to life; hence the life-giving properties of salt are 'emergent'. Likewise, while isolated individual Jews are, by and large, good citizens, their combination as part of the 'Jewish nation' may give that nation an 'emergent' character which is lethal to the West.--John Bryant

[PaleoEuropean]

Europeans feel inadequate to Jews because of the latter's superior merchant skills.

Also why those honkies hate the Vikangz

[EternalYouth]

Also why those honkies hate the Vikangz

I often find myself puzzled by that question, especially yesterday when I was told to stick to Varg (Varg Vikernes, if you are curious) by some honkies. If I had to guess, I will say it's jealousy, they are envious of the Vikangz.