0
fair enough.It's easy to praise something when the information about it has been well-preserved. The culture and customs of the Greeks and Romans are well-recorded, and nobody was successful in wiping out their records. These two factors have resulted in a large amount of information about both cultures being readily available to people who wish to learn more about them.
I will say that one reason why information on the various Celtic tribes is limited is because the Roman Empire wiped out a large portion of their civilizations, resulting in a loss of cultural artifacts. It's hard to form an appropriate, educated opinion on something when there is not a lot of info available.
As to your other remarks:
1. Not everyone obsesses over what ancient people did in the bedroom with one another, so I don't think most historians would take that into consideration when they praise ancient civilizations.
2. I'm assuming you're referring to mythological gods when you say "false idols." You do know that the Celts and Germanics worshiped mythological gods too, right? So if you think it's bad that the Romans and Greeks worshipped mythological gods, you must think it's bad that other civilizations worshipped mythological gods as well?
You don't have to be a huge fan of Roman or Greek culture, but there is no denying that both civilizations DID play a major role in European history. It only makes sense that some historians would find it suitable to talk highly about them.
Bookmarks