0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 118 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,296 Given: 3,160 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,122 Given: 259 |
common occiput in dolicocephalic, this is normal
occipital bun, rounded bundle between neck and head
et tenebras invadere cor meum vindicare meas
Cuanto mas creo saber mas me doy cuenta de lo poco que se, que razon tenia Socrates
El oceano del Atlas en el occidente y el Gran verde en el oriente, el que ha engendrado grandes culturas, descendientes de Celti e Iber, hijos de Hercules, aqui surgimos y aqui seguimos, ese es nuestro legado, es nuestro eje y eso es lo que somos , celtiberos
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20 Given: 0 |
I have that. I'm probably mesocephalic. I've never shaved my head so I don't know if it would show up like that - I can just feel it on the back of my head.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 653 Given: 176 |
I have that to, but little not so prominent.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 17 Given: 0 |
Same for me , i've got this pointed bump in the back of the skull .
Thumbs Up |
Received: 364 Given: 0 |
Most Europid males seem to have it, the degree is more important.
Anyway, mtDNA seems to vary too, with the most important aspect being the rate of non-Europid, non-European and old-European (pre-Neolithic) variants, especially old-European/Mesolithic in Northern and North Eastern Europe.
The latter being most common in very specific populations it seems, especially if talking about U4 and even more U5.
Both seem to be most common among Finno-Ugrian and respectively influenced populations.
U4 is most common in Bashkirs and Volga-Finns, U5 in Finns. I think that speaks for itself. That doesn't have to mean a specific haplogroup like U5 was only present in a certain region and time (Mesolithic Northern Europe), but at least the frequencies changed in regions, populations and over time. So U5 might have been present elsewhere too, but it was just so absolutely dominant in Northern Mesolithics.
Recently a author called lineages pre-Neolithic AND local for Western Europe, for which I doubt it, like explained here:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=35827
In any case, there seems to have been a predominance of related male groups (patrilinear, patrilocal, patriarchal), so many changes seem to have been at least MORE male transmitted and the winner just took most local females, but eliminated or at least put down the local males or took local females even from peaceful neighbours or allies, but kept the male kin together...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9 Given: 0 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks