Slavic settlements in Frisia, England and Scandinavia

**The Lawspeaker** · 03-30-2009, 03:32 PM

Good. Now here are a couple of questions- nr.1 : why would such an important detail not be taken into our history books ?
Question number 2: The Utrecht-area happens to be one of the most archaeologically excavated areas in our incredibly archaeologically excavated country-- where are there NO TRACES WHATSOEVER ??

**Hors** · 03-30-2009, 03:33 PM

Originally Posted by Holtlander

Sorry mate, the Romans left here about the year 270 and after that there werent any people that lived in the area untill the Franks and Frisians took it

How is it relevant to the subject?

**Holtlander** · 03-30-2009, 03:45 PM

Originally Posted by Hors

How is it relevant to the subject?

I had to thank you for that post this shows you dont know what your talking about...you gave timelines, i gave timelines that show they werent here at that time.

Like i said burn your soviet books, you still didnt post any link to it so i will see this as an troll attempt.

**Hors** · 03-30-2009, 03:53 PM

Originally Posted by Holtlander

Because its simply not true, and i dont like it when people tell lies about my country..Celtic settlements in the Netherlands yes..Slavic not at all.

You're simply in denial.

And if you look at our posts all the names written down by him dont have anything to do with the Slavs, Wiltenburg got named after the Wilti wich were the Frisians, Frisians were known to travel with the Saxons to England wich is probably why you can find the name Wilton there.

An Inet query produce sources showing unambigious association of Wilti with Slavs, and nothing about them being Frisians or whatever else

http://www.google.ru/search?hl=ru&cl...A&lr=&aq=f&oq=

**Hors** · 03-30-2009, 03:58 PM

Originally Posted by Holtlander

I had to thank you for that post this shows you dont know what your talking about...you gave timelines,

really?

i gave timelines that show they werent here at that time.

REALLY?

Don't take it as an offence, but it sounds like something coming from a complete cretin. LMAO

Maybe you should elaborate or clarify...

**Hors** · 03-30-2009, 04:00 PM

Here's the link

http://rodina.lv/docman/literatura/z.../download.html

**Holtlander** · 03-30-2009, 04:30 PM

They only talk about the Wilti as neighbours of the western slavs, in Hannover still nothing about the Netherlands, also in the texts they state that the Slavs only whent as far as the Main.

In our language the Wenden are the Slavs where you are talking about the Wilten are the ones that lived in the area of Utrecht wich were Frisians,

You said that in about the 4th-5th century the slavs came over and settled the area, but the only findings there from that time are Frankish and Frisian, also the Frisians build the castle wich was named Wiltenburg(orginally Uiltaburg), not Slavs.

Before that there was an Roman settlement with Batavii living in it, wich they left in 270.

**Hors** · 03-30-2009, 04:34 PM

The descendants of the isolated Slavonic settlers near Utrecht... have also long been absorbed. The ethnological evidence concerning the present inhabitants of these districts and survival of their old place-names, however, supports the statement of the early chroniclers concerning the immigration of Slavs into what is now Holland.

~from Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race

http://books.google.ru/books?id=tDSs...esult#PPA89,M1

**Jamt** · 04-01-2009, 04:19 PM

Slavs settled in Sweden in late Iron-Age.

It is seen in material shifts in pottery and I believe in the emergence of the Scandinavian log-house tradition.

Mats Roslund is a good source on the Slavic material influence: “Gäster i huset. Kulturell överföring mellan slaver och skandinaver 900 till 1300” http://www.ark.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id=8663&sid=115&lang=se

In English

http://www.brill.nl/product_id17282.htm