| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 21,121 Given: 11,131 |
King Tut and family Y-DNA
Seems like Tut really was R1b after all.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,106 Given: 3,279 |
No subclade I assume?
Originally Posted by Dr_Maul
Target: DrMaul
Distance: 0.00000%
100.0 First Man - J2 Atlantean
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 936 Given: 3,026 |
Yo, I am happy for you and I will let you finish but Prince of Egypt is the most accurate depiction of the Egyptians for all times! dawg. For all times!
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 21,121 Given: 11,131 |
I don't think so.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
How no? You have subclade: "b"
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,506 Given: 1,507 |
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 14,021 Given: 6,623 |
We wuz kangz.
R1b Y-DNA and K mtdna, sounds like a good guy afterall.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 64 Given: 0 |
He was R1b1a2 not R1b1a1a2
Sent from my SM-G770F using Tapatalk
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 822 Given: 5,877 |
The subclade is identified as V88 in the comments below the video on Youtube. R-V88 is common today in northern Cameroon. The same back migration from Europe that established it in Egypt probably continued down into what is now Cameroon. Very interesting. Does anyone have a link to the actual paper that is referenced?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
How back?
Do you suggest, that R1b-V88 was previously in Egypt, then migriated to Europe and next to Egypt again?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Sicily
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks