Are Blacks really powerful in the west?

[renaissance12]

Yes, they are powerful, not only in the West, but in the East too. Just think about Käräböğä.


The true strenght of the BLACK MAN:

STEFAN HOLM from Sweden.. he is the best jumper ever in the world any time..






No black "negro" can beat this one....110m hurdles 2 meter high each..

Stefan can dunk over the head of any NBA basket player no matters if he is 2.30 cm tall.. and Stefan is 1.81 cm

This means that Holm is jumping 63.8 inches vertically on each hurdle. To put this in comparison:
•Spud Webb had a vertical of 42 inches at his dunking prime.
•LeBron James has a vertical of approximately 40 inches.
•Chris Conley of the Chiefs set the NFL combine record in 2015 with a vertical of 45.0 inches.

Look, we know there's a BIG difference between a standing vert and a running jump, but despite all this you have to admit that a 63.8 hurdle is ludicrously impressive at any age, let alone 39.
..

[Cristiano viejo]

If Mortimer would has normal job instead of the living on aid gypsie life style, i would not consider him a gypsie but normal european.

You serious??
A Gypsy always will be a Gypsy, does not matter if he has a job or directly 10 millions of euros in the bank.

Assimilation of Gypsies sounds to a crazyness. I dont want the future Europeans have Gypsy blood. The only solution is their expulsion.

[Smeagol]

Blacks are only as powerful as White liberals let them be. They have accomplished nothing in this country without some Whites/Jews pulling the strings.

[Jana]

Kamala is 50% negro and 50 % dravidian.. both are not caucasian...

Dravidians people belong to negroid and australoid race.

She is less than half black, uses black identity due to political advantage it brings. Her Jamaican father is nowhere close to being fully black.

[Jana]

The gypsie case in Europe is totally different that the black case in North America. Whites brought blacks to work in USA by force, the black population contributed a lot to build America since the begining. Gypsies migrated here willingly, they didn't contribute to built Europe because 1. european states were already existed long before the gypsies have arrived, 2. gypsies were not labor force like american blacks but they always travelled between regions as musicians and scavenger peoples. The only solution is gypsies must assimilate into the majority society, we don't need separatists and parallel societies, Europe for europeans and european culture. Gypsies can be part of this society (the problem is most don't want) if they want but they need normal work and life like other europeans have.
By the way this assimilation is impossible democratically, i'm not fan of communist regimes but in the communist Hungary the gypsies were not discriminated, they had houses, job and normal life because the Communist Party forced them in the begining to leave their nomadism and after 20-30 years they were totally assimilated. The gypsie problem appeared again after 1990 when the communism failed and the economy was changed to capitalism. The new elite sold the complete industry and companies to westernes and millions of people lost their job, it was the moment when the gypsies sank down in the lower class society, these idiot liberals gived them aid, money instead of job and now in 2020 there is a second gypsie young generation who didn't see their parents working, they have no working culture and who thinks this is the normal life to get money and aid from the society without work. In fact the dumb liberals and these malcolm x gypsies ruined the gypsie society.

In Romania(Wallachia) Gypsies were enslaved for centuries and forced to work as serfs as far as I know.

[Jana]

that is still a discrimination because the bar for accepting gypsies is much higher then for hungarians, you probably like the punk next door, who drinks and takes drugs as long he shits on gypsies and is racist hungarian. but you dont consider me european, you probably never would even if i had a job, but that also meaens gypsies cant get ill or fall on aid, or they are instantly evil etc. that means gypsies need 3 times as much to prove themselfes, and you dont consider them by their individuality but as group, you consider me only a bad person, because of my group affiliation if i were hungarian you wouldnt have this attachment that i have this negative traits BECUASE Im hungarian, like you think i live on aid BECUASE Im a gypsy. Actually I live on aid, but I dont have this tradition like you associate with gypsies to hate work, and self-segregate by not working, and keep away from normal life, like you attribute to the gypsies. I come from grandparents and parents who worked and taught me working values, you SAY that gypsies DONT WANT TO WORK BECAUSE they have a story or tradition that they hate work. Which is not true. And everyone can be on aid but it is not this story that they reject civilisation for nomadism which you attribute to gypsies.

Why shouldn't it be? Hungary belong to Hungarians. Every non-autochtonous minority needs to be better preforming than local majority population to be accepted, otherwise why would they tolerate them? What do they bring to host society? Minorities like that should prove themself all the time because there is no reason for locals to tolerate them unless they are model minority and bring additional prosperity to the society.

Gypsies are in vast majority parasites. Yes not all, but huge amount of them is. And yes they are brutally over represented in crime statistics.

[Tommie]

YAssimilation of Gypsies sounds to a crazyness. I dont want the future Europeans have Gypsy blood. The only solution is their expulsion.

They'll never assimilate even if they were forced to. They refused to assimilate in the past, they refuse to assimilate today, why would anyone think they will finally accept to assimilate in the future?

[Mortimer]

Why shouldn't it be? Hungary belong to Hungarians. Every non-autochtonous minority needs to be better preforming than local majority population to be accepted, otherwise why would they tolerate them? What do they bring to host society? Minorities like that should prove themself all the time because there is no reason for locals to tolerate them unless they are model minority and bring additional prosperity to the society.

Gypsies are in vast majority parasites. Yes not all, but huge amount of them is. And yes they are brutally over represented in crime statistics.

That is a guideline for immigration gypsies are not immigrants. That is also racist, anti-gypsy and discrimination that you view the gypsies as foreigners and immigrants.

[Rædwald]

If you can be a repeat violent offender, smoke meth, get 'murdered' by a police officer and you still get a memorial in the holocaust museum. Then yes.

[1R0N M4N XL]

In africa obviously not, but in the west they are really powerful through political correctnes, hollywood, media, and such. On German TV I saw a advertisement for the movie Black Panther, and the voice was highly enthusiastic who introduced the movie, sounded highly enthusiastic about it and praised it very much. It is actually a Black Nationalist movie, Im not against it and will watch it but I noticed blacks are really powerful. Recently we had a Black President and now we have a self identified black Vice President.

This movie is actually Black Nationalist, it portrays Blacks in a futuristic setting which is very highly advanced and powerful etc.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1825683/

1) the Democratic party caters to the needs of the Black community.
2) sports, music, cultural soft-power.