Pick your favorite turkic girl

[Edgü]

They are all transcaspian Aralid+iranid

Yomud is a Turkmen Tribe.

The Yomud dude on the photo doesnt look Aralid+Orientalid/Iranid or Transcaspian I'd say he is pred. Cromagnon C

Yomud is a Turkmen Tribe.

That proves my point then he is still not an Iranian Turkmen but a Yomud Turk

[Altaylı]

The Yomud dude on the photo doesnt look Aralid+Orientalid/Iranid or Transcaspian I'd say he is Cromagnon C

Yomud dude looks 100% transcaspian

[Altaylı]

Iranian Turkmen footballer Khodadad Azizi:


looks more mongoloid than chuvashes tatars and bashkirs.

[Altaylı]

That proves my point then he is still not an Iranian Turkmen but a Yomud Turk

Yomud Turkmens living in Iran and Turkmenistan.
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yomut

[Komintasavalta]

According to you also Bashkirs Tatars chuvashes are not Ural Altaic
Being mongoloid doesnt mean Ural Altaic

Sorry. Maybe it was the wrong comparison. I know that Hungarians are not racially Uralic, because they decided to conquer their domain from too far south, so they ended up assimilating too much Southern Caucasoid ancestry. I view Uralic people as a transcontinental North Eurasian race who are mixes between Northern Mongoloids and Northern Caucasoids in different proportions, so anyone from Finns to Nganasans can still be racially Uralic, because they are genetically mostly northern. But maybe a similar analogy doesn't apply to Ural-Altaic peoples as a whole.

However if I traveled to 4,000 BC, I would be very disappointed if proto-Ural-Altaic people looked like Pajeet, like the guy in the bottom right corner here: https://eurasianet.org/turkmenistan-...n-the-army-now.

[Kyp]

Sorry. Maybe it was the wrong comparison. I know that Hungarians are not racially Uralic, because they decided to conquer their domain from too far south, so they ended up assimilating too much Southern Caucasoid ancestry. I view Uralic people as a transcontinental North Eurasian race who are mixes between Northern Mongoloids and Northern Caucasoids in different proportions, so anyone from Finns to Nganasans can still be racially Uralic, because they are genetically mostly northern. But maybe a similar analogy doesn't apply to Ural-Altaic peoples as a whole.

However if I traveled to 4,000 BC, I would be very disappointed if proto-Ural-Altaic people looked like Pajeet, like the guy in the bottom right corner here: https://eurasianet.org/turkmenistan-...n-the-army-now.

Turks are not Uralic. Please don't apply your logic to Turkics. Stick to Uralics.

[Altaylı]

Sorry. Maybe it was the wrong comparison. I know that Hungarians are not racially Uralic, because they decided to conquer their domain from too far south, so they ended up assimilating too much Southern Caucasoid ancestry. I view Uralic people as a transcontinental North Eurasian race who are mixes between Northern Mongoloids and Northern Caucasoids in different proportions, so anyone from Finns to Nganasans can still be racially Uralic, because they are genetically mostly northern. But maybe a similar analogy doesn't apply to Ural-Altaic peoples as a whole.

However if I traveled to 4,000 BC, I would be very disappointed if proto-Ural-Altaic people looked like Pajeet, like the guy in the bottom right corner here: https://eurasianet.org/turkmenistan-...n-the-army-now.

There arent any connection between Uralics and Turkics
If you travel Hunnic era yes you can find same looking guys in Hunnic army

[Rafael Passoni]

5 Karachay, 11 Turkmen and 18 Balkar.

[Dan Coren]

16 > 5 > 25

[Parça do Neymar]

5 (Karachay), 7 (Azeri) and 20 (Turkish), but most of them are pretty.