| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 10,503 Given: 7,001 |
Just look at the jawline, how pointy her jaw is.Originally Posted by Kivan
Yeah, you're right. she is Turanid + Gracile-Indid.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 14,463 Given: 12,450 |
And aren't you the retard who classify someone based on geographical position and nationality?
This is how idiots like you classify people in this forum with such asinine logic:
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 14,463 Given: 12,450 |
Doesn't look pointy at all to me rather wide and her feature look harsh and rather robust. But just my opinion.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 10,503 Given: 7,001 |
Its good to be unbiased in some instances, In this matter tho, in my opinion one has to take indto consideration where the person is from, since it covers most of the phenotypic variety. Its really just laughable to give these classifications by just shooting in the air every timeAnd aren't you the retard who classify someone based on geographical position and nationality?
This is how idiots like you classify people in this forum with such asinine logic:
Last edited by Benyzero; 11-28-2020 at 02:16 PM.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,020 Given: 4,752 |
i think Kivan is one of the best
The Blade Immanenz Kivan my fav taxonomists in TA
edit:Also Latinus too good
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,020 Given: 4,752 |
you are classifying people like an autistic.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 10,503 Given: 7,001 |
Immanenz is quite good besides seeing faelid influence everywhere
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,075 Given: 1,717 |
Nope, you just have bad English. I said a person needs to actually look like the ethnicity their phenotype is supposed to peak in, otherwise it makes 0 sense. That has nothing to do with using the nationality the person is from to determine a classification. A person cannot look Turkish and look Atlantid, they need to look British. You can determine whether someone looks British or Turkish without knowing their ethnicity.And aren't you the retard who classify someone based on geographical position and nationality?
This is how idiots like you classify people in this forum with such asinine logic:
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.divided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpineoldschool anthropology
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 4,075 Given: 1,717 |
My classification process(and overall the Agrippa school of anthropology, former TA member) is actually a more normie and normie friendly way of classification. The school Kivan follows is more based on autistic, smaller features that no one even gives a shit about or pays attention to, let alone knows what they are.
So no, it is not autistic, quite the opposite, and in most cases the more autistic would actually be the more correct and not exactly an insult(but not in this case, because phenotype doesn't predict genetic race).
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.divided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpine
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 11,515 Given: 8,745 |
do i ?never really noticed
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks