classify facial reconstructions of Scythians and Sarmatians

[Dirdepo]

I see a resemblance between this guy and Joseph Stalin.

High CHG

[Altaylı]

I see a resemblance between this guy and Joseph Stalin.

Definitely They dont look eachother reconstructions look turkic my friend sorry

[Bender1999]

@Altayli this reconstructions shouldnt irritate you. Eastern Scythians were different to the "real" Scythians which were very "European". Similar case with Sarmatians. I have seen a lot of early Iranic results, either they were European or they were, how we say,"Turkic", but i am not sure whether they were Iranic speakers or not. Also we cannot claim they were Turkic, regardless of their genetics, we simply dont know anything. But i can say that definitely most of Iranic invaders which migrated to Westasia and stayed in Central Asia were probably nearly non or low east eurasian influenced. Unmixed Tadjiks, which are probably the most "early Iranic" are nearly none east eurasian influenced. I doubt that any Westasian Iranic had east eurasian admix before Turkic expansion, with the exception of Chorasan which was always in contact with northern and eastern peoples.

[Altaylı]

@Altayli this reconstructions shouldnt irritate you. Eastern Scythians were different to the "real" Scythians which were very "European". Similar case with Sarmatians. I have seen a lot of early Iranic results, either they were European or they were, how we say,"Turkic", but i am not sure whether they were Iranic speakers or not. Also we cannot claim they were Turkic, regardless of their genetics, we simply dont know anything. But i can say that definitely most of Iranic invaders which migrated to Westasia and stayed in Central Asia were probably nearly non or low east eurasian influenced. Unmixed Tadjiks, which are probably the most "early Iranic" are nearly none east eurasian influenced. I doubt that any Westasian Iranic had east eurasian admix before Turkic expansion, with the exception of Chorasan which was always in contact with northern and eastern peoples.

I dont claim they were Turkic just reconstructions look quite Turkic

[Altaylı]

@Altayli this reconstructions shouldnt irritate you. Eastern Scythians were different to the "real" Scythians which were very "European". Similar case with Sarmatians. I have seen a lot of early Iranic results, either they were European or they were, how we say,"Turkic", but i am not sure whether they were Iranic speakers or not. Also we cannot claim they were Turkic, regardless of their genetics, we simply dont know anything. But i can say that definitely most of Iranic invaders which migrated to Westasia and stayed in Central Asia were probably nearly non or low east eurasian influenced. Unmixed Tadjiks, which are probably the most "early Iranic" are nearly none east eurasian influenced. I doubt that any Westasian Iranic had east eurasian admix before Turkic expansion, with the exception of Chorasan which was always in contact with northern and eastern peoples.

Also scythians have 10-70% east eurasia so they can be Turanid i cant see any problem

[Radimir]

Definitely They dont look eachother reconstructions look turkic my friend sorry

Yeah, he looks more like Nicholas II of Russia.


s

[Altaylı]

Yeah, he looks more like Nicholas II of Russia.


s

This reconstructions have Turanid cheekbones zero iq pls dont troll my thread

Go cry in another thread

[Altaylı]

ONLY CLASSIFY GUYS!

[Dr_Maul]

exception of Chorasan which was always in contact with northern and eastern peoples.

Early Iranics had some little Eurasian
Those few samples we have are like 2-4% Mongoloid
Wusun is also over 10% I think however that is debated Turkic or Iranic
It makes sense because early Iranics / Aryans and Turkics come from the same origin in my opinion. Both groups are offshoot of the original R1a most likely early Scythian group

[Benyzero]

I see a resemblance between this guy and Joseph Stalin.

you trippin legolas