3
I get your point, what Zoro actually said was for most not incorrect though, however he didn't present it in the best manner. For example I am convinced he could actually had specified more with what he meant with Indian/Pakistani looking. It's clear to us he means Bandaris for example however the average amateur won't know this. In general Bandaris are getting mentioned far too often imo, for the fact that they are even a minority in Hormozgan itself.
About the stats he has shown. We can't argue about it because It is a scientific paper from the Reich lab as far as I remember. Ask yourself why real scientists almost never use admixture tools but formal stats, and if they do use admixture tools always in connection with formal stats as confirmation. It is because formal stats are a more powerfull tool.
Another thing which is obvious to me is that both of you are likely talking past each other. While Zoro means Scythian Sarmatian ancestry (Iron Age Steppe ancestry) the GedMatch calculators are more specified on the Yamnaya Srubnaya, Sintashta ancestry. Also as Zoro pointed out adixture calculators can hide allot of things due to it's limitations.
About the Kurdish samples from Turkmenistan, well they are originally from NW Iran and East Anatolia. Like the Yunusbaev et al. samples collect from Kurds in Kazakhstan they are near identical to the Kurdish samples in Kurdistan as if they barely mixed.
Never the less this debate is getting tiresome. I couldn't care less about Steppe admixture since fortunately it is not a defining factor for the Medes-> Parthians and the tribes/groups united under this umbrella either.
It was more tiresome trying to explain people in the past that Kurds not being genetically identical to Tajiks or Afghans doesn't mean they are not descend of the Median tribes, because genetic similarity to East Iranics does not define West Iranic ancestry.
Bookmarks