Broad faced men antisocial in peace but bond stronger in war

[Dick]

This is not really true. Both of them were supported by Native American allies (Aztecs and Incas had many enemies among other tribes).

Like the Old Indo European proverb; if you can’t beat them join them

[JamesBond007]

Agree that broad faced men are superior but war is not good at all

Anglo-Saxons are superior period. People are all like "Russia defeated Germany in WWII" meanwhile without Russia, not that they did not help, America, Canada, UK and Australia would have eventually defeated Hitler, anyway. I don't think Anglo-Saxons have particularly broad faces as that seems to a thing as you go more East in Europe. Alpine can give broad faces ,in the West, a long with Borreby and maybe Faelid but Alpine is a peasant strain.

Just as the japanese (island-dwellers) are livelier, happier, easier than the dreadful people on the continent the same way the English are superior to Germans and other continentals.

We Anglo-Saxons are superior in plain and practical sense, in industrial activity and political sagacity our race is industrial and commercial more than military so Americans war more than we like.

There is no race in the world equal to us in war, thought, industry, or politics, because we are by nature fitted for this work.

[Aldaris]

This is not really true. Both of them were supported by Native American allies (Aztecs and Incas had many enemies among other tribes).

I didn't claim either of the empires was brought down by just those original parties - they indeed had allies among the natives. But that was even one of my points in here - you win wars by a clever strategy and diplomacy, among other things. But those are generally the one of most important factors, if not the most. And winning wars despite all the odds against you is what being good at war is. Anyhow, the example I posted is valid if I remember correctly - they indeed got him with no outside help and didn't lost any of the conquistadores.

[EM78GREENSAVANNAH]

How about broad dicked men? Are they anti- or pro- social?

[Dick]

I didn't claim either of the empires was brought down by just those original parties - they indeed had allies among the natives. But that was even one of my points in here - you win wars by a clever strategy and diplomacy, among other things. But those are generally the one of most important factors, if not the most. And winning wars despite all the odds against you is what being good at war is. Anyhow, the example I posted is valid if I remember correctly - they indeed got him with no outside help and didn't lost any of the conquistadores.

Cortes indeed was a military genius plus had technology on his side. Rope or cope, Europeans are the most intelligent people on earth.

[Harkonnen]

Cortes indeed was a military genius plus had technology on his side. Rope or cope, Europeans are the most intelligent people on earth.

That's why China own you. 99% of Europeans have intelligence of ameeba. Sooner you accept this fact, the better.

[Dick]

That's why China own you. 99% of Europeans have intelligence of ameeba. Sooner you accept this fact, the better.

Like the Old Indo European proverb; if you can’t beat them join them

[Dick]

Besides, R1 is from Chyna that spread like a virus throughout the world

[Lemminkäinen]

Likely true.

Broad face heroes.

Napoleon:



Stalin



Sitting Bull



Broad faces from Ostrobothnia:



Narrow face heroes.

Hitler:



Caesar:

[Aldaris]

That's why China own you. 99% of Europeans have intelligence of ameeba. Sooner you accept this fact, the better.

Finland is indeed sort of a fringe, but Europe nevertheless - so to say. Shooting yourself in a foot, pal?