| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,756 Given: 917 |
Proto-Turks?
How representative those guys are?
btw sounds great
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Well Osman I was Z93 though.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,020 Given: 4,752 |
Proto Turks:
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,351 Given: 4,487 |
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 11,836 Given: 7,303 |
This information is based on an individual who names himself as a descendant of Osmanoğlu in the former ysearch. There is no proof on it, not even mention a scientific article or a speech from the Osmanoğlu family supports it.Originally Posted by Proto-Shaman
qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,098 Given: 47 |
These guys are Turkified Kurds and Armenians. The original Turkics (Huns) were fully Mongoloid.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,756 Given: 917 |
How about Uyghurs? Many of them don't look particularly mongoloid.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 11,518 Given: 8,746 |
what about genetics than posting some ranodm people
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 1,756 Given: 917 |
Uyghurs are now quite European (25–37%), South Asian ancestries (12–20%), and the other from the East, with Siberian (15–17%) and East Asian (29–47%)
https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/34/10/2572/3864506
Probably it was even higher during migration time.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,748 Given: 9,033 |
Just an example, they were between 30-50% east eurasian. Individuals showed 20-70%, they probably looked like Bashkir-Uzbek or Bashkir-Turkmen mix:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...Dmatch-results
https://www.reddit.com/r/TurkicHisto...8th_century_i/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks