Are there White Nationalist 'leaders' that aren't degenerate?

[XenophobicPrussian]

What is it there to be proud about the witness of the skin? At least ethnic nationalism I can understand as a historic concept (even if barely relevant anymore these days), since through history it represented liberation movements from imperialists, but what substantial identity does white skin even carry?

Who said anything about pride? It's not a dang football game where you're rooting for you team. Sexual preference(also the correlations that go along with said skin colour). It's also the acknowledgement that racism will exist no matter what, so it's probably a good idea not to put ourselves in a position where we can be victims of racism.

Like you shitlibs say as if it's some sort of gotcha, "they don't want to be treated how they treated minorities in the past". Exactly right.

[Toddy Frent]

When looking at movements, I don't just look at what people who lead these movements say. I look at the leader's past and those who give intellectual support to their movement, and when looking at White Nationalists, it's all degenerates. It's so bad that you have to think many of them are FBI informants (and in a few instances, it's has been proven without a doubt in court). Degenerates are easily compromised.

From murder to child porn to being committed by their family to a mental institution to mail order brides, it's pretty much all degenerates.

I think it is intellectual degeneracy, as it's very selfish to be racist. They have not been taught convincingly enough that the world is a cool place. They have not been shown love. It could very well be a psychiatric issue. I'm not sure racism rises to the level of homicide. Nor am I certain that men who desire to marry a foreign bride are doing something "degenerate." But yes, there is a failing in their ability to be "one with the world," and perhaps it is a defect of character. Solution: cure them with love!

[Loki]

There is concrete evidence that proves that people who don't vote are not a 50:50 pro-Trump/anti-Trump split. Trump's overall approval ratings are nowhere near 50%, for example (they're at 38%). Surveys of people who don't vote back up what I'm saying, and pretty much all political analysts and workers would agree with me.

For example, you correctly stated that non-Hispanic Whites vote GOP. Blacks tend to vote Democrat. Blacks are 13% of the population but a much higher percentage of the non-voting population. Your point would only make sense if all demographics were equally unlikely to vote. But, like I said, Democrat-leaning populations are much, much less likely to vote - particularly young people and non-whites - every demographic except one, which is 'men' (men are less likely to vote than women, but more likely to vote GOP).

You just parrot the disinformation and false/fraudulent "polling" seen commonly on CNN and other controlled media. It's not the truth, but quite obviously lies. In every recent election we have seen that these polling companies have been way off, and there is strong evidence that they are pushing an agenda to make it appear as if Trump has less support overall, for example. But we all know and see that this is not true, reality is very different. Stop believing what you hear from the fake news media.

[XCII]

Paul Waggener I think is WN best kept secret.

[Smeagol]

You just parrot the disinformation and false/fraudulent "polling" seen commonly on CNN and other controlled media. It's not the truth, but quite obviously lies. In every recent election we have seen that these polling companies have been way off, and there is strong evidence that they are pushing an agenda to make it appear as if Trump has less support overall, for example. But we all know and see that this is not true, reality is very different. Stop believing what you hear from the fake news media.

Trump's approval rating is actually close to 50% according to Rasmussen Reports (The other polls are fake. The same ones that give Trump an approval rating of 39% also had stuff like Biden winning Wisconsin by 17 points) and sometimes goes above that. About half the country supports Trump.

[Longbowman]

You just parrot the disinformation and false/fraudulent "polling" seen commonly on CNN and other controlled media. It's not the truth, but quite obviously lies. In every recent election we have seen that these polling companies have been way off, and there is strong evidence that they are pushing an agenda to make it appear as if Trump has less support overall, for example. But we all know and see that this is not true, reality is very different. Stop believing what you hear from the fake news media.

You're wrong, and you're exactly as subject, if not way more so to 'fake news media' as anyone else, you just think you're not. You even parrot the classic Trumpeteer 'CNN!' line even though you know I'm British and I know you're a resident of the UK and neither of us has ever watched CNN. Can't you replace that word with a more pertinent word? Something I might have actually watched? The BBC or whatever. In reality, though, I'm a millennial and I literally never ever watch TV at all, much less TV news media. I bet you [now] think Fox News is 'fake news' because it has dumped Trump but 6 months ago would have sung its virtues.

I explained the stats and maths to you, you just don't want to hear it. You'd rather live in a world where the majority of people are with you even though they're clearly not. You don't seem to have a response to the obvious fact (and btw, not a recent fact, young people and minorities have had low turnout for centuries!) that no, non-voters aren't Trump shills, so you've decided to go for ad hom.

'We all know' this, 'we all think' that. Whatever floats your boat, Loki. In a few days, Biden will be in charge, and within a few months, people will be gearing up for midterms, and this will be mostly forgotten.

[Loki]

You're wrong, and you're exactly as subject, if not way more so to 'fake news media' as anyone else, you just think you're not. You even parrot the classic Trumpeteer 'CNN!' line even though you know I'm British and I know you're a resident of the UK and neither of us has ever watched CNN. Can't you replace that word with a more pertinent word? Something I might have actually watched? The BBC or whatever. In reality, though, I'm a millennial and I literally never ever watch TV at all, much less TV news media. I bet you [now] think Fox News is 'fake news' because it has dumped Trump but 6 months ago would have sung its virtues.

I explained the stats and maths to you, you just don't want to hear it. You'd rather live in a world where the majority of people are with you even though they're clearly not. You don't seem to have a response to the obvious fact (and btw, not a recent fact, young people and minorities have had low turnout for centuries!) that no, non-voters aren't Trump shills, so you've decided to go for ad hom.

'We all know' this, 'we all think' that. Whatever floats your boat, Loki. In a few days, Biden will be in charge, and within a few months, people will be gearing up for midterms, and this will be mostly forgotten.

Almost everything you said in this post is false, and wrong. Even the very last sentence, too. I'm not sure you really believe everything you wrote here, it just cannot be. You're just trying on a propagandistic pose. But certainly, you can't believe all that CNN-speak. Or maybe you've been feeding yourself so much with these kind of sources, that you have become brainwashed enough to actually believe it? That's also a possibility. But I guarantee you that the vast majority of Non-Hispanic Whites in America strongly disagrees with you here, and agree with what I've been saying.

As for the news media, they are all the same (CNN, MSNBC, BBC, Guardian, etc etc). Owned by the same cabal and getting instructions from the same intelligence agencies on what narratives to push to the public. And yes, Fox News is included in that, increasingly nowadays. There are still a few good and uncompromised anchors on Fox like Tucker Carlson and Maria Bartiromo, but I don't know how long they will last. Now, most Trump supporters and people with discernment are flocking to alternative sources that are not yet corrupted, like Newsmax and Epoch Times.

[Longbowman]

Almost everything you said in this post is false, and wrong. Even the very last sentence, too. I'm not sure you really believe everything you wrote here, it just cannot be. You're just trying on a propagandistic pose. But certainly, you can't believe all that CNN-speak. Or maybe you've been feeding yourself so much with these kind of sources, that you have become brainwashed enough to actually believe it? That's also a possibility. But I guarantee you that the vast majority of Non-Hispanic Whites in America strongly disagrees with you here, and agree with what I've been saying.

As for the news media, they are all the same (CNN, MSNBC, BBC, Guardian, etc etc). Owned by the same cabal and getting instructions from the same intelligence agencies on what narratives to push to the public. And yes, Fox News is included in that, increasingly nowadays. There are still a few good and uncompromised anchors on Fox like Tucker Carlson and Maria Bartiromo, but I don't know how long they will last. Now, most Trump supporters and people with discernment are flocking to alternative sources that are not yet corrupted, like Newsmax and Epoch Times.

Yeah, you and your Falun Gong propaganda are wrong. Everything I said was correct. We're not going to agree and we've (you've) stopped arguing (as in, providing evidence). You're just repeating your earlier statements as fact. What's the point? We'll see what happens on Wednesday.

The only outlet of the ones listed I read is the BBC, but really only for sport.