Queston to white or ethnic nationalists

[Longbowman]

Anyone can comment, though, not that I can stop you, but I'm aiming this at White Nationalists, and ethnic nationalists from White ethnicities.

If a member of your ethnicity married a non-White (so, not just a Scot marrying a Pole, but a Scot marrying, let's say, a Sudanese Arab, or a Dutch marrying a Filippino), would you consider that person to still be a member of your ethnic group? For the sake of argument, this person is a White or ethnic nationalist (or both), and they're marrying and having kids with an Asian or Black woman, but they claim to still be a White or ethnic nationalist.

How would you view that person? Simply as a race traitor (to both race and/or ethnicity)? Or, do you think you can have Dutch, English, Finnish people who are black, so long as they have White YDNA? Would you yourself perhaps marry the mixed-race daughter or son of such a union? Or would you view them as inherently foreign?

Please answer the poll.

[PaleoEuropean]

I believe in patrilineal descent so it really doesn't matter what someone's mother is. A man is his fathers son.

[Longbowman]

I believe in patrilineal descent so it really doesn't matter what someone's mother is. A man is his fathers son.

Are you a white or ethnic nationalist?

[canadienne]

I'm not ethnic nationalist but if i be, i think we are good area. Because we click on "Genetics" button in Apricity Forum, and we see every genetic groups mix other genetic groups in ancient era or today. We are not pure, we are not have just 1 ethnic ancestry by our DNA results.

Also, white skin alleles have many African groups in Africa. It's scientific truth. White skin or other skin colors doesn't pure or superior. Just a mutation.

[PaleoEuropean]

Are you a white or ethnic nationalist?

As an American nativist I guess you could lump me into both in a lot of regards.

[The Lawspeaker]

I believe in patrilineal descent so it really doesn't matter what someone's mother is. A man is his fathers son.

I share that view. In my eyes, the ancestry of the woman doesn't matter. It's only that if the man that matters as it was under Dutch law until the mid-1980s. Before that, only the man could confer citizenship (patrilineal descent). So any child born to a Dutch father is Dutch. Any child born to a Dutch mother only is Dutch, if the father is.

[Longbowman]

As an American nativist I guess you could lump me into both in a lot of a regards.

Would you accept Blacks as members of your American nation, though? Because if so, you're not really a WN.

[Renekton]

I consider him as a race mixer

[Gota_type_]

I am not an ethnic nationalist because that would mean that I am a sort of extremist. That I want the best for my people, my race, and Europa?? Yes. But this does not make me a White nationalist but a normal human with noble ideas.

And no, a White nationalist that marries and have offspring with non-whites is not a White nationalist anymore, not their offspring is White. It is obvious. I will have nothing against him but I will not support it because I don´t want a Europa of mestizos. We also deserve to be what we are. All races should have a place to live but the only one that is being heavily attacked is the White race.

Change the colours (White for black) and I would say the same. If I was black and I was living in Congo, I would defend it as I defend that I am White, I am European and I want the best for the people I belong to and the continent where my ancestors lived since ancient times. I don´t have a problem that someone calls me a WN or ethnic nationalist, but I am not exactly it. Or would you say that when afroamericans say: "my people", they are black nationalists?

[Gota_type_]

double