0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,064 Given: 3,120 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,653 Given: 21,705 |
That it is old does not mean that it is not valid, and that it is more modern does not make it more reliable either.
It is not that a new study automatically invalidates all previous ones, it is the same as with genetic results and ethnic estimates, you have to look at everything together.
It is quite frustrating that only the new is valid, it gives the impression that the effects of consumerism have reached the field of knowledge.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,653 Given: 21,705 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 185 Given: 72 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,263 Given: 1,176 |
It's typically leftist to overinterpret what a person says, to see something where there isn't.
You should read genetic studies instead of relying on how the media interpret them.
Have you at least read the genetic studies on Western Hunter Gather, especially Cheddarman?
I'm sure not, your liberal bias doesn't include nuance and scientific precision.
Now, I don't want to flood my topic by responding to an anti-scientific leftist (de facto anti-racist) with a weird nickname (sorry but lolita it's a weirdo thing).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks