‘Latino’ is Not a Useful Category: How Americans Get It Wrong

[Cernunnos]

[Alexandro]

Good channel, he makes a lot of interesting videos.

[JosephK]

This guy's an idiot.

[Ranger0075]

This guy's an idiot.

He claims white latinos are of slave owner's background when clearly majority can trait their family back to Europe during XIX/XX century. Probaly same for white americans

[LittleDarkAge]

He claims white latinos are of slave owner's background when clearly majority can trait their family back to Europe during XIX/XX century. Probaly same for white americans

Most White people don't have any ancestor who was a slave master, this is true for White Americans as well as for White Latinos.

[JosephK]

He claims white latinos are of slave owner's background when clearly majority can trait their family back to Europe during XIX/XX century. Probaly same for white americans

I'm sure more of the hip, cool, "systematically oppressed" Latinos have more slaveowner heritage than anyone else in the US...

[JosephK]

He claims white latinos are of slave owner's background when clearly majority can trait their family back to Europe during XIX/XX century. Probaly same for white americans

I'm sure more of the hip, cool, "systematically oppressed" Latinos have more slaveowner heritage than anyone else in the US...

[Komintasavalta]

Most White people don't have any ancestor who was a slave master, this is true for White Americans as well as for White Latinos.

What if the Y-chromosomal Adam owned a slave?

If the ancestors of a person formed a binary tree (which they don't in reality), then over 30 generations, the person would have 2^30 ancestors, which is about 1 billion. It's highly unlikely that none of those billion owned a slave.

[ixulescu]

...

bunch of marxist nonsense, how this garbage gets posted here is hard to understand

[Satem]

No, it's not.

For example Poles are eastblock Latino



Don't listen to it if you don't wanna nightmares