0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Must be a Serb (female). An equal amount of Baltic and North Atlantic
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 North_Atlantic 27.97
2 Baltic 27.35
3 East_Med 17.89
4 West_Med 17.07
5 West_Asian 7.49
6 East_Asian 0.77
7 Amerindian 0.66
8 Oceanian 0.52
9 Northeast_African 0.29
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Serbian 3.87
2 Romanian 5.69
3 Bulgarian 7.74
4 Hungarian 9.52
5 Moldavian 9.65
6 Croatian 10.99
7 Austrian 12.09
8 East_German 13.79
9 Greek_Thessaly 15.32
10 West_German 16.2
11 North_Italian 16.4
12 French 17.24
13 South_Polish 17.5
14 Ukrainian_Lviv 17.56
15 South_Dutch 17.79
16 Tuscan 18.02
17 Ukrainian 18.44
18 Portuguese 19.56
19 Spanish_Galicia 20.11
20 Spanish_Cataluna 20.33
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 55% Tuscan + 45% Southwest_Russian @ 3.44
2 50.6% Tuscan + 49.4% Ukrainian @ 3.5
3 55.9% South_Polish + 44.1% West_Sicilian @ 3.57
4 66% Bulgarian + 34% East_German @ 3.57
5 57.7% Tuscan + 42.3% Belorussian @ 3.58
6 93.7% Serbian + 6.3% Spanish_Valencia @ 3.59
7 62% Tuscan + 38% Lithuanian @ 3.59
8 55.5% Tuscan + 44.5% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 3.61
9 50.8% South_Polish + 49.2% Tuscan @ 3.61
10 96.6% Serbian + 3.4% Sardinian @ 3.61
11 92.5% Serbian + 7.5% North_Italian @ 3.65
12 94.2% Serbian + 5.8% Spanish_Cataluna @ 3.67
13 94.8% Serbian + 5.2% Spanish_Murcia @ 3.69
14 57.3% Tuscan + 42.7% Estonian_Polish @ 3.69
15 95.2% Serbian + 4.8% Spanish_Andalucia @ 3.69
16 62.9% Bulgarian + 37.1% Austrian @ 3.69
17 95.7% Serbian + 4.3% Spanish_Aragon @ 3.7
18 95.4% Serbian + 4.6% Southwest_French @ 3.71
19 94.7% Serbian + 5.3% Portuguese @ 3.71
20 95.2% Serbian + 4.8% Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon @ 3.72
Thumbs Up |
Received: 190 Given: 219 |
Was I added to the list of serbian samples to make some average?
I posted my K13 and K15 in late august/early september. Now I also have G25.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 190 Given: 219 |
Ok, thanks.
Is it better and/or easier to make a PCA with PAST or with R?
Because I'm trying to make a G25 PCA but it's complicated and it's difficult to add and remove rows, I don't know how to zoom in and so on.
I would like to have a PCA with modern averages (possibly some regional averages for our areas) and position myself, like with the famous K15 map.
I dislike big dispersive maps like the vahaduo one, I prefer a simple map with big squares/dots and names, easy to look at.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
vahaduo's pca is the easiest to use:
https://vahaduo.github.io/custompca/
but PAST PCAs are easier to look at.
for PAST it's best to prepare your data in Excel first, then just paste it into PAST.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 190 Given: 219 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,471 Given: 1,541 |
source data - whenever you add or remove a sample from here, the shape of a PCA changes a bit.
projected data - doesn't influence the PCA, they are just projected, like the K15 map. when you are satisfied with the shape of the PCA, then continue to add samples here.
pca data - you don't add samples here, this is where the program outputs the results of the calculation (the PCA). you can copy it and project it as an XY graph in another program (like past)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,681 Given: 11,611 |
Position of Serbian TA members in PCA with north Slavic cluster (Russian, Polish, Ukrainian and Belarus regional averages), and pre-Slavic cluster (Greek and Italian averages)
As seen in the chart, we can be modeled with northern Slavs and southern Italians, but not with northern Italians.
🔴
🔵
⚪
Target: Dušan_scaled
Distance: 1.7521% / 0.01752098
60.4 Slavic: RUS_Sunghir_MA
29.8 Roman: SRB_Svilos_Krusevlje
9.8 Byzantine: TUR_Marmara_Ilipinar_Byz2
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks