0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 981 Given: 564 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 981 Given: 564 |
Target: Bulgarian_averageCode:Early_Slavic:HUN_Avar_Szolad:Av2,0.134311,0.126941,0.081458,0.065569,0.035391,0.033746,0.00987,0.005769,0.004704,-0.02278,-0.002436,-0.005395,0.01219,0.020643,-0.015201,-0.003845,0.005867,0.004561,0.008673,5e-04,0.001497,-0.00272,0.013804,-0.007109,0.002634 Turkic:RUS_Nomad_MA,0.087644,-0.090382,0.050534,0.031331,-0.036314,-0.008925,0.00376,0.007384,-0.009613,-0.016037,-0.007632,-0.001499,0.002527,-0.007019,-0.002172,-0.007425,-0.011735,0.004814,0.004022,-0.001,-0.004243,0.008779,0.001972,-0.00012,-0.002754 Native_Balkan:BGR_IA,0.126344,0.157407,0.007165,-0.051034,0.029852,-0.02259,0.00423,-0.001385,0.007772,0.032074,-0.001461,0.005695,-0.013974,-0.003028,-0.015065,-0.001458,0.01369,0.006968,0.006285,-0.014757,-0.006239,0.004699,-0.007888,0.003494,-0.008861 West_Asian_Anatolian:Greek_Central_Anatolia,0.110029,0.1442053,-0.037209,-0.0592167,-0.0133357,-0.0200803,0.0031333,-0.0029997,-0.0196343,0.0115417,0.0053587,0.0049457,-0.006888,0.0050007,-0.0110387,0.001061,0.0096483,0.0024913,0.0044833,-0.0026263,0.002454,0.0046577,-0.0002877,-0.0003617,-0.0007187 Roman:Iberia_Northeast_Empuries2,0.118376,0.158423,-0.009051,-0.0670225,0.0252355,-0.027889,0.001645,-0.005077,0.0049085,0.042552,0.002842,0.01124,-0.016873,0.003578,-0.018526,-0.0157785,0.0035855,0.0003805,0.004588,-0.0126935,-0.008298,0.001546,0.001664,0.0071095,-0.008502
Distance: 1.2571% / 0.01257085
44.4 Early_Slavic
22.6 Native_Balkan
19.4 West_Asian_Anatolian
11.0 Roman
2.6 Turkic
Target: Romanian_average
Distance: 1.4541% / 0.01454067
48.0 Early_Slavic
24.8 Native_Balkan
14.6 Roman
9.4 West_Asian_Anatolian
3.2 Turkic
Thumbs Up |
Received: 49 Given: 83 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 981 Given: 564 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
Not this bullshit please.
These results are entirely dependent on what samples you're comparing the country averages with.
There's nothing to convince me that an Avar sample from Hungary is more related to Early Slavs than to Balkanites themselves. The region was extremely mixed at that time.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,619 Given: 3,546 |
Classify Me !
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...y-or-phenotype
Please vote here ---------------------------------------------------> https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...e-would-I-pass
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,619 Given: 3,546 |
I don't get greek nor Italian AT ALL on MyHeritage lol just 4% northwest european and 5.5% West Asian
What counts as slavic though? East Europe? Idk... These terms don't make much sense, because the Balkans are also slavic admixed.
I do not have that at all so I can't say
Classify Me !
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...y-or-phenotype
Please vote here ---------------------------------------------------> https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...e-would-I-pass
Thumbs Up |
Received: 981 Given: 564 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 341 Given: 1,207 |
They're a mixture of Paleo-Balkanic peoples, South Slavs and Romans. So to an extent yes but far from "The direct" descendants, I'd still argue it's Mainland Italians that descend from the Romans.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,178 Given: 3,225 |
Clearly manipulated results, there's just no way Romanians are 50% (Early) Slavic. You can't make an average out of poor sampling.
From Anthrogenica:
From what I can see in DNA Relatives is that Romanians reliably get the combination Balkan/Italian/Broadly South European, with Balkan predominating....
For Romanian results in LivingDNA complete mode, the combination of East Balkans, Italian, Iberian (Iberian!), and Aegean looks typical. I tend to view this set as the equivalent of 23andMe’s Balkan/Italian/Broadly South European combo...
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread....l=1#post513777
Most Romanian test results look like that.
Last edited by Tommie; 02-19-2021 at 12:40 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks