Poll! Out of Africa migration theory (origin of Humans) - Do you support it?

[Luso]

Nope, in the caucasian race they are all similar if you take samples of pure caucasian (or base):

North African (without SSA admixture):



Saudi



European:



Caucasus:



)

Those are all so pretty Great selection of "caucasian", a lot of members would not consider those white though! BUT THEY ARE PRETTY SO WHO CARES?

[luc2112]

Those are all so pretty Great selection of "caucasian", a lot of members would not consider those white though!

I don't know which 10-year-old child invented the term white, because it says nothing. In some cases the division is convenient. Israel, Japan and South Korea are strangely considered West. It seems that the "racial problem" is actually percpta income and GDP.
Nobody wants to be associated with poor and black Africa and they are inventing unsupported theories that had their own chipanze, neanderthal and homo-sapiens evolution, parallel and independent of Africa.

Another separation is socio-political. J1 Arabs expanded the Arab empire and Islam. And the Kurds (Indo-Europeans) and Christian Syrian-Lebanese (J2 but the region is influenced by the Roman empire) opposed these Arabs. Considering Arabs as non-white caucasian is justified

[luc2112]

BUT THEY ARE PRETTY SO WHO CARES?

It seems that there is a preference in choosing pure Caucasians as more beautiful, they are easy to perceive and have a more developed and symmetrical jaw. These "first generation" Indo-European Caucasians are in the North Caucasus, northern Iran (Persian/Aryans), Balkans and Central Italy where have many Euro models.

Caucasus:



Northern Iran:









Balkans - Discount their preference for "Pornstar Look"

[Ruggery]

I don't know which 10-year-old child invented the term white, because it says nothing. In some cases the division is convenient. Israel, Japan and South Korea are strangely considered West. It seems that the "racial problem" is actually percpta income and GDP.
Nobody wants to be associated with poor and black Africa and they are inventing unsupported theories that had their own chipanze, neanderthal and homo-sapiens evolution, parallel and independent of Africa.

Another separation is socio-political. J1 Arabs expanded the Arab empire and Islam. And the Kurds (Indo-Europeans) and Christian Syrian-Lebanese (J2 but the region is influenced by the Roman empire) opposed these Arabs. Considering Arabs as non-white caucasian is justified

Japan and Korea are only Western in the economic and capitalist model because if we speak in the cultural sphere they are not Western.

[Ruggery]

I am aware this is a talking point sometimes used by SJWs, (I am not a SJW), but saying humanity originated from Africa isn't same as thinking to be African. Living in Europe for 50,000 years is enough to alter DNA. Dna tests confirm Europeans and Africans aren't genetically the same.
The problem is SJW types use this theory to say 'we're all the same so there's no problem with being replaced with Africans!', but that doesn't necessarily mean the premise by itself is incorrect.

How old do you think humanity is?

[Ruggery]

I believe that a part of humanity, yes but not all, the origin of Europeans and some Asians could be in the Middle East.

[luc2112]

Japan and Korea are only Western in the economic and capitalist model because if we speak in the cultural sphere they are not Western.

Most countries are capitalist, some will consider these countries as the West

[luc2112]

Convenient interpretation (for writers):

https://pacotaylor.medium.com/ancien...e-6261468b4102

https://atlantablackstar.com/2015/04...e-first-china/

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/...th%20Europeans.

https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/22/m...holy-land.html

[Ruggery]

Most countries are capitalist, some will consider these countries as the West

It is because capitalism is the model that works best, I understand that it is not perfect and it also has errors, but the other models are even worse than capitalism.