0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,621 Given: 4,638 |
It's based on Vahaduo regional averages for Bulgaria which were present there earlier.
Now regions for Bulgaria are bigger and there are fewer of them http://vahaduo.genetics.ovh/k13-vahaduo.htm
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,020 Given: 4,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,621 Given: 4,638 |
I am interested for history here, not for politics. If in central Bulgaria exist (or existed) few villages whose names came from Serbian ethnonym, this most likely means Serbs once lived there. I wonder what happened with them and i want to know more about them.
I don't claim any piece of Bulgaria. Serbs who claim some most western parts of Bulgaria are very rare. Bulgarians who claim eastern and southeastern Serbia are much more numerous.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,157 Given: 6,705 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,822 Given: 1,097 |
Its okay we all know that many of them are descendants of Bulgar, you also mentioned Vlachs, Serbia is country with most assimilated Vlachs so far, and your north part is full with Magyars which actually would be same, especially Novi Sad and environment .And stop reading Wikipedia 90% of data there is fake, anyone can adding/modifying/removing.
Btw Macedonia-Highlander from your vahaduo results is Macedonian from Southeast part not Vlach.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,861 Given: 8,987 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks