0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,632 Given: 4,642 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 42 Given: 20 |
Look like Turk.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,632 Given: 4,642 |
Pontid-Med
Thumbs Up |
Received: 42 Given: 20 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,518 Given: 9,854 |
Looks West Asian (Caucasus, Turkey). This is majority phenotype among Aromanians who account for almost all the dark types in Romania that aren't Gypsy.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
This is nonsense. Aromanians in Romania are majority Med, not West Asian.
The West Asian phenotypes in Romania have 3 main sources: Tatars, Gypsies, and Turks from Dobrogea and the Danube cities (unlike the rest of Wallachia, the cities along the Danube were under Ottoman control for 400 years).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
No, that's false. Aromanians didn't settle in Romania in any numbers until 150 years ago.
That said, half of the ruling class in the Romanian principalities was not of Romanian origin, but Byzantine. This was true before and after the Phanariote era, although it's worth mentioning that these ruling families lost their Greek identity pretty early on.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,518 Given: 9,854 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,518 Given: 9,854 |
Hold your horses! By West Asian I meant Near Eastern (Turkish/Armenian/Caucasian and Greek to a lesser extent), as you can see in my original response. As a matter of fact I didn't include other possible ancestries (all dating back to Phanariot times):
- Greek ancestry
- Armenian ancestry
- Georgian ancestry
Which is why today Near Eastern looking Romanians (or Greek Med like ones) are almost nonexistent in Transylvania...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks